it to yours or just add
this information (i.e. other scenarios where class loading not working) to
your JIRA?
Details below:
Tom
The documentation in the collections1/conf directory is confusing. For
example the collections1/conf/solrconfig.xml file says you should put a
./lib dir in your
making some kind of a configuration error. I also don't understand the
workaround in SOLR-4852.
Is this an ICU issue? A java 7 issue? a Solr 4.4 issue, or did I simply
not understand the README.txt?
Tom
--
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException
=solr.SchemaSimilarityFactory discountOverlaps=true
/
Tom
.
Is the default for Solr 4 true?
similarity class=solr.BM25SimilarityFactory
float name=k11.2/float
float name=b0.75/float
bool name=discountOverlapsfalse/bool
/similarity
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi Tom,
Don't
I should have said that I have set it both to true and to false and
restarted Solr each time and the rankings and info in the debug query
showed no change.
Does this have to be set at index time?
Tom
requested to 100,000, I have no problems.
Does Solr have a limit on number of rows that can be requested or is this
a bug?
Tom
INFO: [core] webapp=/dev-1 path=/select
params={shards=XXX:8111/dev-1/core,XXX:8111/dev-2/core,XXX:8111/dev-3/corefl=vol_idindent=onstart=0q=*:*rows=100}
hits
, which would result in about 3 billion pages. So testing the
scalability of queries used by our current production system, such as the
query against the index that is not released to production to get a list of
the unique ids that are actually indexed in Solr is part of that testing
process.
Tom
are
sending to the head shard and actually get a good measure of how many bytes
are being sent around.
I'll poke around and look at multipartUploadLimitInKB, and also see if
there is some servlet container limit config I might need to mess with.
Tom
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Shawn
=52952
Tom
INFO: [core] webapp=/dev-1 path=/select
params={fl=vol_idindent=onstart=700q=*:*rows=100}
hits=119220943 status=0 QTime=9772
Jul 25, 2013 5:39:43 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [core] webapp=/dev-1 path=/select
params={fl=vol_idindent=onstart=800q
.
Tom
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 7/11/2013 1:47 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
We are seeing the message too many merges...stalling in our indexwriter
log. Is this something to be concerned about? Does it mean we need to
tune something in our
Hello,
We are seeing the message too many merges...stalling in our indexwriter
log. Is this something to be concerned about? Does it mean we need to
tune something in our indexing configuration?
Tom
?
Does the NRTCachingDirectory have any benefit for indexing under the use
case noted above?
I'm guessing we should just use the solrStandardDirectoryFactory instead.
Is this correct?
Tom
---
!-- The DirectoryFactory to use for indexes
sort=last_updated_date desc
Maybe adding %20 will help:
sort=last_updated_date%20desc
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-results-by-last-update-date-tp4066692p4066986.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
%28int%29
This is followed by an example of how to set the min and max block size in
Lucene.
Is the ability to set the min and max block size available in Solr?
If not, should I open a JIRA?
Tom
--
Exceprt from the Solr 4.3 latest rev of the example/solrconfig.xml file:
http
I'm on 4.1 and I have a similar problem. Except for the version number
everything else seems to be fine. Is that what other people are seeing?
--
View this message in context:
warming with your most common terms.
On the other hand as Jan pointed out, you may be cpu bound because Solr
doesn't have early termination and has to rank all 90 million docs in order
to show the top 10 or 25.
Did you try the OR search to see if your CPU is at 100%?
Tom
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10
and if yes:
why?
Thanks for any hint,
Tom
This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information
and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
please
immediately notify us by email or telephone and delete the original email and
attachments
same set of stop words for all
fields that you search on.
You might find this useful :
http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/solr-stop-wordsdismax-gotcha/
--- On Wed, 3/13/13, Burgmans, Tom tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com wrote:
From: Burgmans, Tom tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com
Subject
for body but search as a phrase for
valueadd?
Thanks,
Tom Burgmans
This email and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information
and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
please
immediately notify us by email or telephone and delete
type's analyzer does with
its value is irrelevant to query parsing.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Burgmans, Tom
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:48 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Search in String and Text_en fields simultaneously with edismax
I have a field
York, NY, USA, 75-82.
DOI=10.1145/1571941.1571957 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1571957
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
result (and show up in each explain from the debugQuery?)
This is Solr 3.6.
Tom
-
str name=parsedqueryocr:aardvark/str
lst name=explain
str name=mdp.390150591683130.4395488 = (MATCH)
fieldWeight(ocr:aardvark in 504374), product
Thanks Hoss,
Yes it is a distributed query.
Tom
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: I have a one term query: ocr:aardvark When I look at the explain
: output, for some matches the queryNorm and fieldWeight are shown and for
: some matches
Hello,
I'm trying to understand some Solr relevance issues using debugQuery=on,
but I don't see the coord factor listed anywhere in the explain output.
My understanding is that the coord factor is not included in either the
querynorm or the fieldnorm.
What am I missing?
Tom
. i.e. ABC =
searched as AB BC only AB gets highlighted even if the matching string is
ABC. (Where ABC are chinese characters such as 大亚湾 = searched as 大亚 亚湾,
but only 大亚 is highlighted rather than 大亚湾)
Is there some highlighting parameter that might fix this?
Tom Burton-West
/boundaryScanner
Thanks, Tom
--
Tom Burgmans
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDDFA4.2B7968E0]
Search Specialist
Tel: +31 (0)17 246 66 33
Mobile: +31 (0)6 306 821 78
Platform Technologies
Global Platform Organization
Zuidpoolsingel 2
2408 ZE, Alphen aan den Rijn
: Description:
C:\Users\dhil2\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\ExperisIT.jpg]
Tom Polak
IT Recruiter
Experis IT Staffing
1122 Oberlin Road
Raleigh, NC 27605
T:
919 755 5838
F:
919 755 5828
C:
919 457 8530
tom.po...@experis.commailto:tom.po...@experis.com
www.experis.comhttp
.
This doesn't seem right. Couldn't fit the whole analysis output on one
screen so there are two screenshots attached.
Any clues as to what is going on and whether it is a problem?
Tom
here. Can someone point me to documentation
or examples?
Tom
Simplified schema.xml excerpt:
fieldType name=CJKFullText class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100 autoGeneratePhraseQueries=false
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.ICUTokenizerFactory
frequencies
2) Shows how to configure termvectors in Solr schema.xml to only store term
frequencies, and not positions and offsets?
Tom
OR,
in case an Explicit OR is added to the query expression. The parsedquery
information confirms this behavior.
Why is edismax doing this?
Tested on a Solr 4.0.0 instance.
Thanks, Tom
--
Tom Burgmans
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDD86E.DC411F70]
Search Specialist
Tel: +31 (0)17 246 66 33
Mobile
to prefix all my
search terms with a +.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Wednesday 12 December 2012 05:46
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: edismax: implicit AND changes into implicit OR
On 12/12/2012 5:51 AM, Burgmans, Tom wrote:
I have some
AND changes into implicit OR
On 12/12/2012 10:27 AM, Burgmans, Tom wrote:
I have set solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/ in the schema (and
restarted Solr), and tested again with
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/browse?defType=edismaxq=(Thomas+Michael)+OR+xxxmatchesnothingxxxq.op=AND
note
In our case it's the opposite. For our clients it is very important that every
synonym gets equal chances in the relevancy calculation. The fact that nol
scores higher than net operating loss, simply because its document frequency
is lower, is unacceptable and a reason to look for ways to
at the EXPLAIN information to see how the final score is calculated.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha [mailto:sangeetha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday 13 December 2012 08:33
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: score calculation
I want to know how score is calculated?
what
Sounds like it's worth a try! Thanks Andre.
Tom
On 5 Dec 2012, at 17:49, Andre Bois-Crettez andre.b...@kelkoo.com wrote:
If you do grouping on source_id, it should be enough to request 3 times
more documents than you need, then reorder and drop the bottom.
Is a 3x overhead acceptable
Thanks, but even with group.main=true the results are not in relevancy (score)
order, they are in group order. Which is why I can't use it as is.
Tom
On 6 Dec 2012, at 19:00, Way Cool way1.wayc...@gmail.com wrote:
Grouping should work:
group=truegroup.field=source_idgroup.limit=3group.main
docs that way, but the potential
overhead is large.
Is there any way of doing this in Solr without hacking in a custom Lucene
Collector? (which doesn't look all that straightforward).
cheers,
Tom
) production implementations
that have tested the new ranking models available in Solr.
Tom
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Floyd Wu floyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Does anybody can kindly tell me how to setup solr to use BM25?
By the way, are there any experiment or research shows BM25
work either:
mysolr.umich.edu/analysis/field?name=titleq=fire-fly
No matter what field I specify, the analysis returned is for the default
field. (See repsonse excerpt below)
Is there a page somewhere that shows the correct syntax for sending get
requests to the FieldAnalysisRequestHandler?
Tom
Thanks Robert,
Somehow I read the doc but still entered the params wrong. Should have
been analysis.fieldname instead of analysis.name Works fine now.
Tom
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the UI uses this behind the scenes, as in no more
Hi Markus,
No answers, but I am very interested in what you find out. We currently
index all languages in one index, which presents different IDF issues, but
are interested in exploring alternatives such as the one you describe.
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale
, application/csv, application/javabin,
text/xml, application/json]
We use exactly the same code without problem with Solr 3.6.
We are sending a ContentType 'text/xml'.
Is it likely that there is some other problem and this is just not quite
the right error message?
Tom
Thanks Jack,
That is exactly the problem. Apparently earlier versions of Solr ignored
the extra text, which is why we didn't catch the bug in our code earlier.
Thanks for the quick response.
Tom
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
That message makes
Hi Darshan,
Can you give us some more details, e.g. what do you mean by database? A
RDBMS? Which software? How are you indexing it (or intending to index it) to
Solr? etc...
cheers,
Tom
On 25 Sep 2012, at 09:55, darshan dk...@dreamsoftech.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any
Hi,
Why do you think that the indexes should be independent? What would be the
problem with using a single index and filter queries?
Tom
On 25 Sep 2012, at 03:21, 韦震宇 weizhe...@win-trust.com wrote:
Dear all,
The company I'm working in have a website to server more than 10
customers
/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport
Tom
On 25 Sep 2012, at 11:28, darshan dk...@dreamsoftech.com wrote:
My Document is Database(yes RDBMS) and software for it is postgresql, where
any change in it's table should be reflected, without re-indexing. I am
indexing it via DIH process
Thanks,
Darshan
-Original Message
remove the whole doc, not
just the uniqueID field.
Tom
On 20 Sep 2012, at 13:38, Spadez james_will...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi.
My SQL database assigns a uniqueID to each item. I want to keep this
uniqueID assosiated to the items that are in Solr even though I wont ever
need to display
-Xmx500M.
I must be doing something stupid - surely this result is unexpected? Does
anybody have any thoughts where it might be going wrong?
cheers,
Tom
Before anyone asks, these results were obtained warm.
On 20 Sep 2012, at 14:39, Tom Mortimer tom.m.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After reading
http://carsabi.com/car-news/2012/03/23/optimizing-solr-7x-your-search-speed/
, I thought I'd do my own experiments. I used 2M docs from wikipedia
/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_change_the_score_of_a_document_based_on_the_.2Avalue.2A_of_a_field_.28say.2C_.22popularity.22.29
Tom
On 19 Sep 2012, at 02:49, deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Tom
Thank you for your link, but after overviewing it, I dont think it will
help... In my case
Surrey - q=Surrey fq=bed:3
I guess this kind of thing could also be implemented as a Solr query plug-in.
Don't know if anything like it exists.
Tom
On 18 Sep 2012, at 11:30, george123 daniel.tarase...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I could come up with a synonyms.txt file and every instance of
3
Hi,
Would this do the job? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent
Tom
On 18 Sep 2012, at 01:36, deniz denizdurmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have a requirement or a pre=requirement for our search application.
Basically the engine will be on a website with plenty
name=parsedquerytext:fire text:fly/str
If a correct dismax query was being sent to Solr the parsedquery would have
something like the following:
str name=parsedquery(+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((text:fire text:fly)))
Tom Burton-West
Thanks Erik,
Just found out that there is already a bug report for this open as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3811.
Tom
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
That's definitely a bug. dismax=true is not the correct parameter to
send. Should
in the
example file does not exlain what the termIndexDivisor does.
Would it be appropriate to add these back to the wiki page? If not, could
someone add a line or two to the comments in the Solr 4.0 example file
explaining what the termIndexDivisor doe?
Tom
make sense for the default codec, then
maybe they need to be commented out or removed from the solr example
solrconfig.xml.
Tom
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom: I already enhanced the javadocs about this for Lucene, putting
warnings everywhere in bold
or solrconfig.xml?
Is there some simple way to specify minBlockSize and maxBlockSize in
schema.xml?
Once I get this all working and understand it, I'll be happy to draft some
documentation.
I'm really looking forward to experimenting with 4.0!
Tom
Tom
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Robert Muir rcm
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer create
INFO: Creating SolrCore 'collection1' using instanceDir:
/l/solrs/dev/solrs/4.0/3/collection1
Aug 23, 2012 12:06:02 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
I think somehow the previous solr.xml configuration is being stored on disk
somewhere and loaded.
Any clues?
Tom
wiki page and
the release notes should point this out.
Tom
-3753
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
I did not describe the problems correctly.
I have 3 solr shards with solr homes .../solrs/4.0/1 .../solrs/4.0/2 and
.../solrs/4.0/2solrs/3
For shard 1 I have a solr.xml file with the modifications described
, it was very
wierd to still get a message about a missing collection1 core directory.
See this JIRA issue:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3753
Tom
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
Tom -
I corrected, on both trunk and 4_x, a reference to solr
Hi Lance,
I don't understand enough of how the field collapsing is implemented, but I
thought it worked with distributed search. Are you saying it only works if
everything that needs collapsing is on the same shard?
Tom
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Tirthankar,
Can you give me a quick summary of what won't work and why?
I couldn't figure it out from looking at your thread. You seem to have a
different issue, but maybe I'm missing something here.
Tom
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tirthankar Chatterjee
tchatter...@commvault.com
numFound = 325. This
shows that the items in the group are distributed between different shards.
What am I missing here? What is it that you are saying does not work?
Tom
Field Collapse query ( IP address changed, and newlines added and shard
urls simplified for readability)
http://solr
Hello,
Usually in the example/solr file in Solr distributions there is a populated
conf file. However in the distribution I downloaded of solr 4.0.0-BETA,
there is no /conf directory. Has this been moved somewhere?
Tom
ls -l apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/example/solr
total 107
drwxr-sr-x 2 tburtonw
Thanks Markus!
Should the README.txt file in solr/example be updated to reflect this?
Is that something I need to enter a JIRA issue for?
Tom
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi - The example has been moved to collection1/
-Original
and take a look at the memory use using JConsole.
Tom
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Tirthankar Chatterjee
tchatter...@commvault.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
We had an issue where we are keeping millions of docs in a single node and
we were trying to group them on a string field which
users the choice of
a list of the most relevant pages, or a list of the books containing the
most relevant pages. We have approximately 3 billion pages. Does anyone
have experience using field collapsing on this sort of scale?
Tom
Tom Burton-West
Information Retrieval Programmer
Digital Library
Opened a JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3589, which
also lists a couple other related mailing list posts.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.eduwrote:
Hello,
My previous e-mail with a CJK example has received no replies. I
verified
, but want to find out if I am missing
something here.
Details of several queries are appended below.
Tom Burton-West
edismax query mm=2 query with hypenated word [fire-fly]
lst name=debug
str name=rawquerystring{!edismax mm=2}fire-fly/str
str name=querystring{!edismax mm=2}fire-fly/str
str name
]
turns into a Boolean OR query for ( [two] OR [thirds] ).
Is there some way to tell the edismax query parser to stick with mm =100%?
Appended below is the debugQuery output for these two queries and an
exceprt from our schema.xml.
Tom
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale
, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com
mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, tom dev.tom.men...@gmx.net
mailto:dev.tom.men...@gmx.net wrote:
cross posting this issue to the dev list in the hope to get
ok tested it myself and a slave runnning embedded works, just not within
my application -- yet...
On 20.06.2012 18:14, tom wrote:
hi,
i was just wondering if i need to do smth special if i want to have an
embedded slave to get replication working ?
my setup is like so:
- in my clustered
hi,
i'm using the suggester with a file like so:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent name=suggest
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggest/str
str
name=classnameorg.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester/str
str
BTW: a core unload doesnt release the lock either ;(
On 21.06.2012 14:39, tom wrote:
hi,
i'm using the suggester with a file like so:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent name=suggest
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggest/str
str
name
reason for this or rather a bug?
should i move the topic to the dev list?
On 21.06.2012 14:49, tom wrote:
BTW: a core unload doesnt release the lock either ;(
On 21.06.2012 14:39, tom wrote:
hi,
i'm using the suggester with a file like so:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent
runs in a jetty.
- the embedded codes dont expose any of the solr servlets
note: that the slave config, if started in jetty, does proper
replication, while when embedded it doesnt.
using solr 3.5
thx
tom
, maxDocs=17707)
0.625 = fieldNorm(field=ocr, doc=16624)
/str
Tom Burton-West
-
str name=78562575E066497D-518
0.42061833 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(ocr:the in 8396), product of:
7.071068 = tf(termFreq(ocr:the)=50)
1.087715 = idf(docFreq=16219, maxDocs=17707)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(field
and this is one of the querie from our log.
Tom Burton-West
lst name=debug
str name=rawquerystring 兵にな^1000 OR hanUnigrams:兵にな/str
str name=querystring 兵にな^1000 OR hanUnigrams:兵にな/str
str name=parsedquery((+ocr:兵に +ocr:にな)^1000.0) hanUnigrams:兵/str
str name=parsedquery_toString((+ocr:兵に +ocr:にな
understanding of Japanese, I can see how perhaps bigramming
a Han and Hiragana character might make sense but what about Han and Katakana?
Lance, how did you weight the unigram vs bigram fields for CJK? or did you just
OR them together assuming that idf will give the bigrams more weight?
Tom
Thanks wunder,
I really appreciate the help.
Tom
characters are formed:
いろは革命歌 =“いろ” ”ろは“ “は革” ”革命” “命歌”
Is there a way to specify that you don’t want bigrams across character types?
Tom
Tom Burton-West
Digital Library Production Service
University of Michigan Library
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
solrconfig was 2,147,483,647 we would never hit this limit, but I was wondering
about why it is no longer in the example.
Tom
so any one has a clue what's (might be) going wrong ?
or do i have to debug and myself and post a jira issue?
PS: unfortunately i cant give anyone the index for testing due to NDA.
cheers
On 22.03.2012 10:17, tom wrote:
same
On 22.03.2012 10:00, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Can you try
hi folks,
i think i found a bug in the spellchecker but am not quite sure:
this is the query i send to solr:
http://lh:8983/solr/CompleteIndex/select?
rows=0
echoParams=all
spellcheck=true
spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true
spellcheck.extendedResults=no
q=a+bb+ccc++
and this is the result:
same
On 22.03.2012 10:00, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Can you try spellcheck.q ?
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:57:19 +0100, tom dev.tom.men...@gmx.net wrote:
hi folks,
i think i found a bug in the spellchecker but am not quite sure:
this is the query i send to solr:
http://lh:8983/solr/CompleteIndex
Seems like a change in default behavior like this should be included in the
changes.txt for Solr 3.5.
Not sure how to do that.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Naomi Dushay [mailto:ndus...@stanford.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
was also noted in changes.txt.
Is it possible to revise the changes.txt for 3.5?
Do you by any chance know where the change in the default behavior was
discussed? I know it has been a contentious issue.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent
on-the-fly. That way they can search within
the document and get page level results.
More details about our setup: http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
Tom Burton-West
University of Michigan Library
www.hathitrust.org
-Original Message-
so much as a side effect of a
larger problem (like why the operation is taking so long).
--
Tom Lianza
CTO, Wishpot.com
skype: tlianza
Interesting info.
You should look into using Solid State Drives. I moved my search engine to
SSD and saw dramatic improvements.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Huge-Performance-Solr-distributed-search-tp3530627p346.html
Sent from the Solr - User
.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Cooke [mailto:tom.co...@gossinteractive.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 20:06
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Can dynamic fields defined by a prefix be used with LatLonType?
Hi,
I'm adding support for lat/lon data into an existing schema which uses
prefix
,
Tom
Sign-up to our newsletter for industry best practice and thought leadership:
http://www.gossinteractive.com/newsletter
Registered Office: c/o Bishop Fleming, Cobourg House, Mayflower Street,
Plymouth, PL1 1LG. Company Registration No: 3553908
This email contains proprietary
Getting a solid-state drive might help
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/millions-of-records-problem-tp3427796p3431309.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
UniqueId avoids entries with the same id.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-any-attribute-in-schema-xml-to-avoid-duplication-in-solr-tp3392408p3393085.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
and do some performance tests on my
kludge. That might work for us as an interim measure until I have time to dive
into the Solr/Lucene distributed faceting code.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 9:20 PM
result set. In my use case the
top 10,000 hits versus all 170,000.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Lan [mailto:dung@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting facet counts for 10,000 most relevant hits
I implemented
facet values with the highest counts for those
relevant documents.
Is this possible or would it require writing some lucene or Solr code?
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
in the example
configuration. Took a quick look at the code, but I'm obviously looking in the
wrong place. Is mergeFactor=10 interpreted by TieredMergePolicy as
segmentsPerTier=10 and maxMergeAtOnce=10? If I specify values for these is
the mergeFactor setting ignored?
Tom
-Original
201 - 300 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
