the Solr
TieredMergePolicy to set the parameters:
setMaxMergeAtOnce, setSegmentsPerTier, and setMaxMergedSegmentMB?
Tom Burton-West
the Solr
TieredMergePolicy to set the parameters:
setMaxMergeAtOnce, setSegmentsPerTier, and setMaxMergedSegmentMB?
Tom Burton-West
!--400GB /20=20GB or 2MB--
double name=setMaxMergedSegmentMB2/double
/mergePolicy
and got this error message
SEVERE: java.lang.RuntimeException: no setter corrresponding to
'setMaxMergedSegmentMB' in org.apache.lucene.index.TieredMergePolicy
Tom Burton-West
10K documents. Why not just batch them?
You could read in 10K from your database, load em into an array of
SolrDocuments. and them post them all at once to the Solr server? Or do em
in 1K increments if they are really big.
--
View this message in context:
Is it a good rule of thumb, that when dealing with large indexes copyField
should not be used. It seems to duplicate the indexing of data.
You don't need copyField to be able to search on multiple fields. Example,
if I have two fields: title and post and I want to search on both, I could
just
Thanks Erick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p3275816.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Bill,
I was using it as a simple default search field. I realise now that's not
a good reason to use copyField. As I see it now, it should be used if you
want to search in a way that is different: use different analyzers, etc; not
for just searching on multiple fields in a single query.
ideas?
thanks,
Tom
; }
}
On 10 August 2011 16:43, simon mtnes...@gmail.com wrote:
Th attachment isn't showing up (in gmail, at least). Can you inline
the relevant bits of code ?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tom Mortimer t...@flax.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Apologies if this is really basic. I'm trying to learn
You can use solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory in an analyser chain for both
indexing and queries. The schema.xml supplied with example has several field
types using this (including text_general).
Tom
On 10 August 2011 16:42, nagarjuna nagarjuna.avul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi please help me
Interesting.. is this in trunk (4.0)? Maybe I've broken mine somehow!
What classpath did you use for compiling? And did you copy anything other
than the new jar into lib/ ?
thanks,
Tom
On 10 August 2011 18:07, simon mtnes...@gmail.com wrote:
It's working for me. Compiled, inserted in solr
Thanks Simon. I'll try again tomorrow.
Tom
On 10 August 2011 18:46, simon mtnes...@gmail.com wrote:
This is in trunk (up to date). Compiler is 1.6.0_26
classpath was
dist/apache-solr-solrj-4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:dist/apache-solr-core-4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
built from trunk just prior by 'ant dist
so many shards that the overhead of distributing the queries, and
consolidating/merging the responses becomes a serious issue.
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
*
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search/scaling-large-scale-search-50-volumes-5
machines:)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: performance crossover between single index and sharding
Hi Tom,
Very interesting indeed! But i keep wondering why some
, for that!
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tom Grossitconse...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 04:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
The solr download link does not point to or mention nightly builds.
Are they out there?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%2Bsolr+%2Bnightlybuildsl=1
--
Auther of the book Plone
On 07/05/2011 04:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
The solr download link does not point to or mention nightly builds.
Are they out there?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%2Bsolr+%2Bnightlybuildsl=1
--
Auther of the book Plone 3 Multimedia - http://amzn.to/dtrp0C
Tom Gross
email.@toms
(but
99th percentile times of about 2 seconds).
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
of the JVM you are using?
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
Hi,
I also have this issue with Solr 3.2.0. It is probably this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381
Tom
On 06/15/2011 02:09 PM, Mark Cunningham wrote:
Hi,
If you submit information to solr using xml, does the server assume you're
using unicode encoded in utf8? And does it accept
give any details about the number of shards per machine and the total
memory on the machine.
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
From: Dmitry Kan [dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:15 PM
To: solr-user
Thank you Koji,
I'll take a look at SingleFragListBuilder, LUCENE-2464, and SOLR-1985, and I
will update the wiki on Monday.
Tom
There is SingleFragListBuilder for this purpose. Please see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2464
3
?
Thanks in advance
Greg
--
Auther of the book Plone 3 Multimedia - http://amzn.to/dtrp0C
Tom Gross
email.@toms-projekte.de
skype.tom_gross
web.http://toms-projekte.de
blog...http://blog.toms-projekte.de
indicating whether they apply to only the regular highlighter or the FVH?
Tom Burton-West
Hi Koji,
Thank you for your reply.
It is the feature of FVH. FVH supports TermQuery, PhraseQuery, BooleanQuery
and DisjunctionMaxQuery
and Query constructed by those queries.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that FVH supports MultiTerm
highlighting?
Tom
://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search/too-many-words-again for
details) We later ran into memory problems when indexing so instead changed
the index time parameter termIndexInterval from 128 to 1024.
(More details here: http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search)
Tom Burton-West
.
Tom Burton-West
query
str name=qocr:tink*/str
highlighting params:
str name=hl.highlightMultiTermtrue/str
str name=hl.fragsize200/str
str name=hl.useFastVectorHighlightertrue/str
str name=hl.snippets200/str
str name=hl.fragmentsBuildercolored/str
str name=hl.fragListBuildersimple/str
str name
using the
fastVectorHighLighter as long as we don't do a MultiTerm query. For example
see the query and results appended below (using the same hl parameters listed
in the previous email)
Tom
str name=qocr:tinkham/str
lst name=highlighting
of the text, so I would
suspect even with the largest ramBufferSizeMB, you might run into problems.
(This is with the 3.x branch. Trunk might not have this problem since it's
much more memory efficient when indexing
Tom Burton-West
www.hathitrust.org/blogs
query against
the index for not history?
Tom
mapping to b - c too, and I want to have the possibility to
remove a Token d - .
How can I do this, when the next methods returns only one Token, not a
collection?
Buffer them internally. Look at SynonymFilter.java, it does exactly this.
Tom
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http
settings?
Tom
All,
We have created index with CommonGrams and the final size is around
370GB.
Everything is working fine but now when we add more documents into index
it
takes forever (almost 12 hours)...seems to change all the segments file
in a
commit.
The same commit used
Hi Salman,
We had a similar problem with the IndexMergeTool in Lucene contrib.
I seem to remember having to hack the IndexMergeTool code so that it wouldn't
create the CFF automatically.
Let me know if you need it and I'll dig up the modified code.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From
a lot of memory.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/misc/src/java/org/apache/lucene/misc/HighFreqTerms.java?view=log
Tom
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
-Original Message-
From: mdz-munich [mailto:sebastian.lu...@bsb-muenchen.de
double name=maxMergeMB200/double
/mergePolicy
In the flexible indexing branch/trunk there is a new merge policy and parameter
that allows you to set the maximum size of the merged segment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-854.
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large
Thanks everyone.
I updated the wiki. If you have a chance please take a look and check to make
sure I got it right on the wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#tie_.28Tie_breaker.29
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent
is the sum of the sub scores.
Typically a low value (ie: 0.1) is useful.
Tom Burton-West
with regular searches against the
index or with other facet queries. Only with this facet. Is TermInfoAndOrd
only used for faceting?
I'll go ahead and build the patch and let you know.
Tom
p.s. Here is the field definition:
field name=topicStr type=string indexed=true stored=false
multiValued
some number to trigger the bug?
I rebuilt lucene-core-3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar with your patch and it fixes the
problem.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:00 PM
To: Burton-West, Tom
Cc: solr-user
,bigTerms=0,termInstances=1368694,uses=0}
Apr 8, 2011 2:01:58 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
Is this a known bug? Can anyone provide a clue as to how we can determine what
the problem is?
Tom Burton-West
Appended Below is the exception stack trace:
SEVERE: Exception during facet.field
name=dfcv_text_en/str
str name=dfcv_text_de/str
...
str name=hlon/str
str name=hl.flcv_text/str
/lst
I've tried playing with other hl. parameters, but have had no luck so
far. Any ideas?
thanks,
Tom
I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr highlight non-indexed fields?
Tom
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer t...@flax.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields
Problem solved. *bangs head on desk*
T
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer t...@flax.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
one of several fields configured appropriately (e.g
subclass solr.SearchHandler?
I know nothing about Solr internals at the moment...
thanks,
Tom
if the index is large enough so disk I/O is a factor.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Glen Newton [mailto:glen.new...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
Cc: sivaram
Subject: Re: Using Solr over Lucene effects performance?
I
This page discusses the reasons why it's not a simple one to one mapping
http://www.kanji.org/cjk/c2c/c2cbasis.htm
Tom
-Original Message-
I have documents that contain both simplified and traditional Chinese
characters. Is there any way to search across them? For example, if someone
we might look to determine the cause?
Tom
Tom Burton-West
Jan 7, 2011 2:31:07 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.RuntimeException: [was class java.net.SocketTimeoutException]
Read timed out
at
com.ctc.wstx.util.ExceptionUtil.throwRuntimeException
and
SolrIndexConfig trying to better understand how solrconfig.xml gets
instantiated and how it affects the readers and writers.
Tom
From: Robert Muir [rcm...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Your
will be in proportion to the
net size of the merge (mergeFactor + how big each merged segment is),
how many merges you allow concurrently, and whether you do false or
true deletions
Does an optimize do something differently?
Tom
. Is the use during merging the
similar to the use during searching?
i.e. Some process has to look up data for a particular term as opposed to
having to iterate through all the terms?
(Haven't yet dug into the merging/indexing code).
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
in terms of the number or size
of segments?
Our largest segments prior to the failed merge attempt were between 5GB and
30GB. The memory allocated to the Solr/tomcat JVM is 10GB.
Tom Burton-West
-
Changes to indexing configuration
everything have to be
stuffed into a java system property?
Tom Burton-West
or unique
terms? You might check your faceting algorithms, and see if you could
use enum, instead of fc for some of them.
Check your statistics page, what's your insanity count?
Tom
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:17 PM, John Russell jjruss...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been load testing solr 1.4.1
Check out this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
Look, in particular, for stemming.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Jack O jack_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Need one more help:
What do I have to do so that search will work for singulars and plurals ?
I
java -jar start.jar --help
More docs here
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/A+look+at+the+start.jar+mechanism
Personally, I usually limit access to localhost by using whatever
firewall the machine uses.
Tom
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Jack O jack_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello
failed, if any do, if you
delete with a list, but you are not using unsuccessful now anyway.
Tom
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Ravi Kiran ravi.bhas...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Tom for responding. On an average the docs are around 25-35 KB.
The code is as follows, Kindly let me know if you see
?
Tom
If you can benchmark before and after, please post the results when
you are done!
Things like your index's size, and the amount of RAM in your computer
will help make it meaningful. If all of your index can be cached, I
don't think fragmentation is going matter much, once you get warmed
up.
Tom
), and they deleted
quickly (17 milliseconds).
Maybe if you post your delete code? Are you doing anything else (like
commit/optimize?)
Tom
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Ravi Kiran ravi.bhas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Iam using solr 1.4.1 when I delete by query or Id from solrj
#solr.KeepWordFilterFactory
I'd put the synonym filter first in your configuration for the field,
then the keep words filter factory.
Tom
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:06 PM, lee carroll
lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:
ok thanks for your response
To summarise the solution then:
To only index synonyms
. But it's trivial to do.
So, I wouldn't recommend it, but it was fun to play around with. :)
It's probably easier to fix the load balancer, which is almost
certainly just looking for any string you specify. Just change what
it's expecting. They are built so you can configure this.
Tom
On Tue, Dec
is will be
(city:San) (Francisco)
Probably not what you want.
3) Will complex boolean filters like this substantially
slow down query performance?
That's not very complex, and the filter may be cached. Probably won't
be a problem.
Tom
Thanks
happens if you configure your slave
as a master, also? Does that get the behavior you want?
Tom
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Yes, i read that too in the replication request handler's source comments. But
i would find it convenient if it would just
said, use the = syntax. You've already got it. Add the lines
pretty = scenic
text = words
to synonyms.txt, and it will do what you want.
Tom
On 7 Dec 2010 01:28, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
If you are using another app to create the index, I think you can remove the
update servlet mapping in the web.xml.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-access-to-localhost-tp2004475p2014129.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
, 2010 5:40:33 PM IW 0 [Wed Dec 01 17:40:33 EST 2010;
http-8091-Processor12]: flushedFiles=[_5h.frq, _5h.tis, _5h.prx, _5h.nrm,
_5h.fnm, _5h.tii]
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:43 PM
To: solr
and then restart Solr.
Is this a feature or a bug? What is the rationale?
Tom
Tom Burton-West
Tom Burton-West
on the production indexer. If it doesn't I'll turn it on and post
here.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:43 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: ramBufferSizeMB not reflected in segment sizes
of them are marked as deleted
numDocs is the actual number of undeleted documents
If you run an optimize the index will be rewritten, the index size will go down
and numDocs will equal maxDocs
Tom Burton-West
-Original Message-
From: Claudio Devecchi [mailto:cdevec...@gmail.com]
Sent
An optimize takes lots of cpu and I/O since it has to rewrite your indexes, so
only do it when necessary.
You can just use curl to send an optimize message to Solr when you are ready.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Passing_commit_parameters_as_part_of_the_URL
Tom
of writing the appropriate Solr filter factories? Are
there any tricky gotchas in writing such a filter?
If so, should I open a JIRA issue or two JIRA issues so the filter factories
can be contributed to the Solr code base?
Tom
me to it :)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support
from Solr
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Burton-West
Hoss or someone else point me to more detailed information on what might be
involved in the two ideas listed above?
Is somehow keeping an up-to-date map of unique Solr ids to internal Lucene ids
needed to implement this or is that a separate issue?
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs
after we optimize an index and before we mount it in production. In our
workflow, we update the index and optimize it before we release it and once it
is released to production there is no indexing/merging taking place on the
production index (so the internal Lucene ids don't change.)
Tom
Thanks Yonik,
Is this something you might have time to throw together, or an outline of what
needs to be thrown together?
Is this something that should be asked on the developer's list or discussed in
SOLR 1715 or does it make the most sense to keep the discussion in this thread?
Tom
to look at the code
when I get back to make sure.
We aren't using term vectors now, but we plan to add them as well as a number
of fields based on MARC (cataloging) metadata in the future.
Tom
optimum mergeFactor somewhere between 0 (noMerge
merge policy) and 1,000. (We are also planning to raise the ramBufferSizeMB
significantly).
What experience do others have using a large mergeFactor?
Tom
assume these are Java ints but the
number depends on the number of hits. Is there a good way to estimate (or
measure:) the size of this in memory?
Tom Burton-West
as
a phrase query.
Tom Burton-West
necessarily using the Boolean OR operator?
i.e. if solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/
and autoGeneratePhraseQueries = off
then IndexReader - index reader - index AND reader
Tom
Maybe process the city name as a single token?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Savannah Beckett
savannah_becket...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I have city name as a text field, and I want to do spellcheck on it. I use
setting in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
If I setup city
Lucene-2458 is working on a better fix.
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
fieldType name=CommonGramTest class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
−
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter class
Delete all docs with the dynamic fields, and then optimize.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Moiz Bhukhiya moiz.bhukh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All:
I had used dynamic fields for some of my fields and then later decided to
make it static. I removed that dynamic field from the schema but I still
wouldn't use either of the last two.
Tom
p.s. Not sure what is going on with the last lines of your debug
output for the query. Is that really what shows up after presentation
ID? I see Euro, hash mark, zero, semi-colon, and H with stroke
str name=parsedquery_toString
all_text:open +all_text:excel
provide you with our tii/tis
data. I'll let you know as soon as I hear anything.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 10:48 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Solr memory use, jmap
termIndexInterval with Solr 1.4.1 on our test server.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
.What are your current GC settings? Also, I guess I'd look at ways you can
reduce the heap size needed.
Caching, field type choices, faceting choices
prefiltering prior to
sending documents to Solr for indexing. However, since with now have over 400
languages , we will have to be conservative in our filtering since we would
rather index dirty OCR than risk not indexing legitimate content.
Tom
600,000
full-text books in each shard).
In interpreting the jmap output, can we assume that the listings for utf8
character arrays ([C), java.lang.String, long int arrays ([J), and int
arrays ([i) are all part of the data structures involved in representing the
tii file in memory?
Tom Burton
Solr is waiting on GC?
If we could get the time for each GC to take under a second, with the trade-off
being that GC would occur much more frequently, that would help us avoid the
occasional query taking more than 30 seconds at the cost of a larger number of
queries taking at least a second.
Tom
+1
I just had occasion to debug something where the interaction between the
queryparser and the analyzer produced *interesting* results. Having a separate
jsp that includes the whole chain (i.e. analyzer/tokenizer/filter and qp) would
be great!
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael
/explain will indicate whether the parsed query is a PhraseQuery.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Peter Karich [mailto:peat...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improve Query Time For Large Index
Hi Tom,
I tried again
class=solr.CommonGramsQueryFilterFactory words=new400common.txt/
/analyzer
/fieldType
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Peter Karich [mailto:peat...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improve Query Time For Large Index
Hi Tom,
my
/slow-queries-and-common-words-part-2)
Tom Burton-West
-Original Message-
From: Peter Karich [mailto:peat...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Improve Query Time For Large Index
Hi,
I have 5 Million small documents/tweets (= ~3GB
This question has come up several times over the past weeks.
The cause is probably all your fields being of type string.
This is only good for exact matches like id's etc.
Try using text or another type that tokenizes.
-Original Message-
From: Hando420 [mailto:hando...@gmail.com]
Sent:
stemmer page:
http://snowball.tartarus.org/algorithms/english/stemmer.html
Tom Burton-West
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
dug in to the code so I don't
actually know how the tii file gets loaded into a data structure in memory. If
there is api access, it seems like this might be the quickest way to get the
number of unique terms. (Of course you would have to do this for each segment).
Tom
-Original Message
the
nomerge merge policy. I hope to have some results to report on our blog
sometime in the next month or so.
Tom Burton-West
www.hathitrust.org/blogs
-Original Message-
From: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 8:18 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Is there any reason why you have to limit each instance to only 1M
documents?
If you could put more documents in the same core I think it would
dramatically improve your response times.
-Original Message-
From: marship [mailto:mars...@126.com]
Sent: donderdag 15 juli 2010 6:23
To:
If you're only adding documents you can also have a go with
StreamingUpdateSolrServer instead of the CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Couple that with the suggestion of master/slave so the searches don't
interfere with the indexing and you should have a pretty responsive
system.
-Original Message-
Is the Solr process still running?
Also what OS are you using?
-Original Message-
From: ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS [mailto:g.zarogki...@multirama.gr]
Sent: dinsdag 13 juli 2010 10:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Locked Index files
I found it but I can not delete
Any
301 - 400 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
