Shawn,
Do you (or anybody else here) know of the upgrade steps from 6.1 to 6.2 in
this case? The release notes of 6.2 do not mention anything about
upgrading, but 6.2 has some good bugfixes.
If 6.2 made changes to the index format, is a drop-in replacement from 6.1
to 6.2 still possible?
Apologies for cross posting a question from SO here.
I am very interested in the new faceting on child documents feature of Solr
5.3 and would like to know if somebody has figured out how to do it as
asked in the question on
I am using the Block Join Query Parser with success, following the example
on:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-BlockJoinQueryParsers
As this example shows, each parent document can have a number of documents
embedded, and each document, be it a parent
Hi,
I am running solr 5 using basic_configs and have a questions about the
order of defining fields and dynamic fields in the schema.xml file?
For example, there is a field hierarchy.of.fields.Project I am capturing
as below as text_en_splitting, but the rest of the fields in this
hierarchy, I
, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 6 March 2015 at 11:21, Tom Devel deve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am running solr 5 using basic_configs and have a questions about the
order of defining fields and dynamic fields in the schema.xml file?
For example
phrases - you're just trying to match
the product name and availability.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Tom Devel deve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am running Solr 5.0.0 and have a question about proximity search and
multiValued fields.
I am indexing xml files
Hi,
I am running Solr 5.0.0 and have a question about proximity search and
multiValued fields.
I am indexing xml files of the following form with foundField being a field
defined as multiValued and text_en my in schema.xml.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
adddoc
field name=id8/field
field
positionIncrementGap comes in. By putting 1000 in
for it, you guarantee
a b~999 won't match 'a' in one field and 'b' in another.
whereas a AND b would match across successive MV entries no matter what the
gap.
HTH,
Erick
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Tom Devel deve...@gmail.com wrote:
Jack
Hi,
I successfully combined Solr and UIMA with the help of
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrUIMA and other pages (and am happy to
provide some help about how to reach this step).
Right now I can run an analysis engine and get some primitive
feature/fields which I specify in the schema.xml
