Solr-7 CorruptIndexException: checksum failed (hardware problem?)

Hello everyone, I use the version of Solr-7.7.3. The following error occurred during the index write phase, but after restarting the Solr service, the file was deleted, and access to the index has also been restored. Has anyone ever encountered this mistake? Caused by:

Re: Meet CorruptIndexException while shutdown one node in Solr cloud

Hi Erick, Thanks for your advice about having openSearcher set to true unnecessary for my case. For CorruptIndexException issue, I think Solr should handle this quite well too. Because I always shutdown tomcat gracefully. Recently I did a couple of tests about this issue. When

Re: Meet CorruptIndexException while shutdown one node in Solr cloud

bq: This means Solr may get update request during shutdown. I think that is the reason we get CorruptIndexException. This is unlikely, Solr should handle this quite well. More likely you encountered some other issue, one possibility is that you had a disk full situation and that was the root

Meet CorruptIndexException while shutdown one node in Solr cloud

st to Solr once get new message. This means Solr may get update request during shutdown. I think that is the reason we get CorruptIndexException. Since we begin to do the reboot, we always get CorruptIndexException. The trace is as below: 2017-09-14 04:25:49,241 ERROR[commitScheduler-15-thread

Re: CorruptIndexException during optimize.

Hi, Kindly provide your inputs on the issue. Thanks, Modassar On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Modassar Ather wrote: > Hi, > > Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node > cluster. Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and

CorruptIndexException during optimize.

Hi, Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node cluster. Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and what could be the reason? Total number of nodes: 12 No replica. Solr version - 5.4.0 Java version - 1.7.0_91 (Open JDK 64 bit) Ubuntu version : Ubuntu

Re: getting frequent CorruptIndexException and inconsistent data though core is active

Anyone has any inputs on this? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-frequent-CorruptIndexException-and-inconsistent-data-though-core-is-active-tp4204129p4204347.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

getting frequent CorruptIndexException and inconsistent data though core is active

, then it reports that it succeeded, and then the CorruptIndexException is thrown while trying to open searcher. this core is marked as active and thus query can get redirected there and this causes data inconsistency to users. this occurs with solr 4.10.3, should be noted that I use nested docs. ANOTHER

upgrading from 4.0 to 4.1 causes CorruptIndexException: checksum mismatch in segments file

hi all I have been working on moving us from 4.0 to a newer build of 4.1 I am seeing a CorruptIndexException: checksum mismatch in segments file error when I try to use the existing index files. I did see something in the build log for #119 re LUCENE-4446 that mentions flip file formats

Re: upgrading from 4.0 to 4.1 causes CorruptIndexException: checksum mismatch in segments file

- From: solr-user Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 2:03 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: upgrading from 4.0 to 4.1 causes CorruptIndexException: checksum mismatch in segments file hi all I have been working on moving us from 4.0 to a newer build of 4.1 I am seeing

Re: CorruptIndexException: Unknown format version

It looks like your solr lucene-core version doesn't match with the lucene version used to generate the index, as Yonik said, looks like there is a lucene library conflict. 2009/8/19 Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org: : how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt? :

Re: CorruptIndexException: Unknown format version

: how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt? : : Did anybody else something like this? Unknown format version doesn't mean your index is corrupt .. it means the version of LUcnee parsing the index doesn't recognize the index format version ... typically it means you

CorruptIndexException: Unknown format version

Hi, how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt? Did anybody else something like this? WARN - 2009-08-07 10:44:54,925 | Solr index directory 'data/solr/index' doesn't exist. Creating new index... WARN - 2009-08-07 10:44:56,583 | solrconfig.xml uses deprecated

Re: CorruptIndexException: Unknown format version

Wow, that is an interesting one... I bet there is more than one Lucene version kicking around the classpath somehow. Try removing all of the servlet container's working directories. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Maximilian

Re: CorruptIndexException

Robert Haschart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To answer your questions: I completely deleted the index each time before retesting. and the java command as shown by ps does show -Xbatch. The program is running on: uname -a Linux lab8.betech.virginia.edu 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Tue Feb

Re: CorruptIndexException

which is what caused me to upgrade to Lucene version 2.3.1 and start experiencing the CorruptIndexException. Basically we have a set of 112 files dumped from our OPAC in a binary Marc record format, each of which contains about 35000 records. In addition to those files we have a set of daily

Re: CorruptIndexException

problem which is what caused me to upgrade to Lucene version 2.3.1 and start experiencing the CorruptIndexException. Basically we have a set of 112 files dumped from our OPAC in a binary Marc record format, each of which contains about 35000 records. In addition to those files we have a set

Re: CorruptIndexException

Mike, You are right it does sound exactly like that situation. The java version is: java version 1.6.0_05 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode) Which seems to be the same as the one giving the other poster problems. I

Re: CorruptIndexException

Hmmm, not good. One other thing to try would be -Xint, which turns off hotspot compilation entirely. On that last case that also prevented the issue. Did you cleanly rebuild your index when you retested? And you're really certain your JRE is running with -Xbatch? (You should be able

CorruptIndexException

Greetings all, We are using Solr to index Marc records to create a better, more user friendly library catalog here at the University of Virginia. To do this I have written a program starting from the VuFind Java importer written by Wayne Graham (from the College of William Mary). After

Re: CorruptIndexException

Which exact version of the JRE are you using? Can you try running java with -Xbatch (forces up front compilation)? Your situation sounds very similar to this one: http://lucene.markmail.org/message/awkkunr7j24nh4qj Mike On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Robert Haschart wrote: Greetings

CorruptIndexException: unknown format version: -3

2Hi all, Is there any way to recover from such an error as listed in the subject heading? Luke can view the index just fine (at least at a cursory level Luke is able to open the index, give me back the # of docs, etc.), but solr throws this exception whenever I try and start it up. any ideas

Re: CorruptIndexException: unknown format version: -3

did you create/modify the index with a newer version of lucene than the one you use in solr? In this case I doubt you can downgrade your index, but maybe you can upgrade lucene in your solr (search in this forum, there should be a thread about this), (or try with the latest nightly builds)

Re: CorruptIndexException: unknown format version: -3

2Unfortunately, the answer is no. I didn't use an upgraded version of lucene or solr. this is the bizzarre issue. I'm actually using solr via the acts_as_solr plugin used in ruby. At the time, I was adding a few 100-thousand docs to the index...there appears to have been a memory leak as

index out of disk space, CorruptIndexException

We had an index run out of disk space. Queries work fine but commits return h1500 doc counts differ for segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104 but segmentInfo shows 212 org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: doc counts differ for segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104 but

Re: index out of disk space, CorruptIndexException

On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: ug -- maybe someone else has better ideas, but you can try: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java thanks for the tip, i did run that, but I stopped it 30 minutes in, as it was