\ manager\ summary, fund\ manager\ report
--- On Fri, 11/26/10, Jason Brown jason.br...@sjp.co.uk wrote:
From: Jason Brown jason.br...@sjp.co.uk
Subject: Synonym Filtering on String Fields
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 12:15 PM
I have the following field
Besides Ahmet's comments, I have to wonder if you want to do this in a
single field?
The problem is that you're expanding your synonyms into a field. Let's say
you
expand memory into memory, recall and RAM. Now you have three
tokens in your field. What does faceting mean now? Perhaps you would be
Filtering on String Fields
Besides Ahmet's comments, I have to wonder if you want to do this in a
single field?
The problem is that you're expanding your synonyms into a field. Let's say
you
expand memory into memory, recall and RAM. Now you have three
tokens in your field. What does faceting mean
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, November 12, 2010 8:46:31 PM
Subject: filtering or getting accurate crawling results
How easy is it to get good results from the Lucene crawling software?
Let's say for example I wanted only information about a general subject,
but
nothing else? (Sorry, not ready
How easy is it to get good results from the Lucene crawling software?
Let's say for example I wanted only information about a general subject, but
nothing else? (Sorry, not ready to say what exactly at this point) Is it like
tuning Solr, or IS it tuning Solr to just not accept what does not fit
.
- Original Message
From: Dennis Gearon gear...@sbcglobal.net
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, November 12, 2010 8:46:31 PM
Subject: filtering or getting accurate crawling results
How easy is it to get good results from the Lucene crawling software?
Let's say for example I wanted only
: ExternalFileField can only be used for boosting. It is not a
: first-class field.
correct, but it can be used in a FunctionQuery, which means it can be
filtered on (using frange) and (on trunk) it can be sorted on, which are
the two needs the OP asked about...
: : Another approach would be
to
customize the solr?Please any suggestions.
Regards,
JS
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Filtering-results-based-on-score-tp1819769p1819769.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
As part of solr results i am able to get the max score.If i
want to filter
the results based on the max score, let say the max
score is 10 And i need
only the results between max score to 50 % of max
score.This max score is
going to change dynamically.How can we implement this?Do we
need
be contributed back
and reused by all.
With all of that said: there has also been a recent contribution of a
MoneyFieldType for dealing precisesly with multicurrency
sorting/filtering issues that you should definitley take a look at...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2202
-Hoss
/filtering issues that you should definitley take a look at...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2202
-Hoss
In our current search app, we have sorting and filtering based on item
prices. We'd like to extend this to support sorting and filtering in the
buyer's native currency with the items themselves listed in the seller's
native currency. E.g: as a buyer, if my native currency is the Euro, my
search
Wow, this is probably the most annoying Solr issue I've *ever* dealt
with. First question: How do I debug Dismax, and its query handling?
Issue: When I query against this StrField, I am attempting to do an
*exact* match... Albeit one that is case-insensitive :). So, 90%
exact. It works in a
fieldType
name=idstr class=solr.StrField
analyzer
tokenizer
class=solr.PatternTokenizerFactory pattern=(.*)
group=1/
filter
class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
/analyzer
This definition is invalid. You cannot use charfilter/tokenizer/tokenfilter
with
Wow, that's pretty infuriating. Thank you for the suggestion. I
added it to the Wiki, with the hope that if it contains misinformation
then someone will correct it and, consequently, save me from another
one of these experiences :) (...and to also document that, hey, there
is a tokenizer which
the schema.xml
Thanks for the help!
Scott
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:43, Lance Norskoggoks...@gmail.com wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However
build from today, Sep 7th, with the same
results. I attached the schema.xml
Thanks for the help!
Scott
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:43, Lance Norskoggoks...@gmail.com wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering
, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*sort=dist(2,latitude,longitude,0,0)+asc'
I get
at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.comwrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*sort=dist(2,latitude,longitude,0,0)+asc'
I get
wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q
at 18:43, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott K s...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http
, with the same
results. I attached the schema.xml
Thanks for the help!
Scott
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:43, Lance Norskoggoks...@gmail.com wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott Ks...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott K s...@skister.com wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*sort=dist(2
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*sort=dist(2,latitude,longitude,0,0)+asc'
I get an error:
Error 400 can not sort on unindexed field: dist
Hi!
I am trying to get spatial filtering to work, but have some trouble
while trying to understand what the status is.
The version of solr I'm using is a nightly build of 21-Jun-2010.
I have this field definition in my schema:
field name=location type=location indexed=true stored=true
Hi!
I am trying to get spatial filtering to work, but have some trouble
while trying to understand what the status is.
The version of solr I'm using is a nightly build of 21-Jun-2010.
I have this field definition in my schema:
field name=location type=location indexed=true stored=true
filtering feature (added in r962727
by Grant Ingersoll, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568)
working. I'm trying to get all the documents located within a circle defined
by its center and radius.
I've modified my query url as specified in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
interpreted as a range). Does anyone know what the
right syntax? This is not documented...
Cheers,
Olivier
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Olivier Ricordeau
oliv...@ricordeau.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I can't manage to have the new spatial filtering feature (added in
r962727
by Grant Ingersoll, see
Hi folks,
I can't manage to have the new spatial filtering feature (added in
r962727 by Grant Ingersoll, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568) working. I'm trying to
get all the documents located within a circle defined by its center and
radius.
I've modified my query url
filtering feature (added in r962727
by Grant Ingersoll, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568)
working. I'm trying to get all the documents located within a circle defined
by its center and radius.
I've modified my query url as specified in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
Here's my config for the updateProcessor. It not uses another signature method
but i've used TextProfileSignature as well and it works - sort of.
updateRequestProcessorChain name=dedupe
processor
class=org.apache.solr.update.processor.SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory
bool
Well, it got me too! KMail didn't properly order this thread. Can't seem to
find Hatcher's reply anywhere. ??!!?
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 22:00:06 Andrew Clegg wrote:
Andrew Clegg wrote:
Re. your config, I don't see a minTokenLength in the wiki page for
deduplication, is this a recent
Markus Jelsma wrote:
Well, it got me too! KMail didn't properly order this thread. Can't seem
to
find Hatcher's reply anywhere. ??!!?
Whole thread here:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tt479039.html
--
View this message
Thanks guys.
I will try this with some test documents, fingers crossed.
And by the way, I got the minTokenLen parameter from one of the thread
replies (from Erik).
Cheerz,
Ali
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tp479039p880044.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tp479039p880385.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, I'm a long-time lurker, first-time poster. I have an issue with a
search filter I need to resolve and I'm not sure how to handle it. I
have documents like the one below that I am searching against. The
field editionsarray is only present in the document if it has
specific editions attached to
Hi, I'm a long-time lurker,
first-time poster. I have an issue with a
search filter I need to resolve and I'm not sure how to
handle it. I
have documents like the one below that I am searching
against. The
field editionsarray is only present in the document if it
has
specific editions
worked like a charm, thanks
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
fq=-editionsarray:[* TO *] should do the job.
if anything is wrong with the query or is there any
configuration issues related to solr in order to make this work
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-help-in-filtering-records-based-on-radius-value-in-solr-tp775644p775644.html
Sent from
: For example, in dice.com, the visitor can search by some keyword and filter
: further by Skill, Country, Province, City, Telecommute, Travel Required
: (shown on the left pane on dice.com). We were wondering if there is some
: built-in feature/functionality that can be used from Solr to
Hi,
I have looked at:
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene
This looks like it provides a proper way which I will try out for sure, but I
also wanted to compare it against a less proper approach.
In an application we are storing offers which can be available
Hi
We are planning to use Solr in one of our projects.We are implementing
functionality where the user performs a search further refines the search
results based on various parameters like location, age and other parameters.
For example, in dice.com, the visitor can search by some keyword and
Hi everyone,
I am attempting to implement a faceted drill down feature with Solr. I am
having problems explaining some results of the fq parameter.
Let's say I have two fields, 'people' and 'category'. I do a search for 'dog'
and ask to facet on the people and category fields.
I am told that
'
Subject: filter queries not fully filtering
Hi everyone,
I am attempting to implement a faceted drill down feature with Solr. I am
having problems explaining some results of the fq parameter.
Let's say I have two fields, 'people' and 'category'. I do a search for 'dog'
and ask to facet
in WildcardQuery
fq=countries:germany* = 0 results but it seems that it lists only the
fields beginning with germany
What is the correct syntax ?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Fred
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Filtering-a-string-containing-a-certain-value-with-fq
Fredouille91 wrote:
Hello,
I have a field (named countries) containing a list of values separated
with comma to wich belongs each document.
This field looks like this : france,germany,italy
It means that tjhis document is related to France, Germany and Italy.
If you can have country field
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Filtering-a-string-containing-a-certain-value-with-fq---tp27590860p27593402.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I want to add a filter to my query which takes documents whose city
field has either Bangalore of cochin or Bombay. how do i do this?
fq=city:bangalorefq=city:bombay fq=city:cochin will take the
intersection. I need the union.
Please help
Thanks
Hi
I want to add a filter to my query which takes documents
whose city
field has either Bangalore of cochin or Bombay. how do i do
this?
fq=city:bangalorefq=city:bombay fq=city:cochin
will take the
intersection. I need the union.
fq=city:(bangalore OR cochin OR bombay)
same syntax as
in the wiki?
Thanks!
Andrew.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tp27127151p27127151.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
I'm interested in near-dupe removal as mentioned (briefly) here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication
However the link for TextProfileSignature hasn't been filled in yet.
Does anyone have an example of using TextProfileSignature that
*
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/processor/TextProfileSignature.java
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tp27127151p27128173.html
Sent from the Solr - User
On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
Thanks Erik, but I'm still a little confused as to exactly where in
the Solr
config I set these parameters.
You'd configure them within the processor element, something like
this:
str name=minTokenLen5/str
The example on the wiki
-- it won't be til next week at the earliest though.
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Filtering-near-duplicates-using-TextProfileSignature-tp27127151p27128493.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Nov 19, 2009, at 4:59 PM, aseem cheema wrote:
Hey Guys,
I need to filter out some results based on who is performing the
search. In other words, if a document is not accessible to a user
performing search, I don't want it to be in the result set. What is
the best/easiest way to do this
as a filtering mechanism for search results. Additionally, we
do not have unlimited sets of roles and that helps to keep the query
string on the HTTP GET to a minimum. Finally, the roles for my system
are additive such that if there is a match on any one role - the user
has access - so an OR clause
to Solr.)
So when peforming the search query, we add add an fq parameter to filter
search results. For example q=Search Phrasefq=role:(role1 || role2 ||
role3)
Note that ultimate restriction to content is handled elsewhere, this is
only done as a filtering mechanism for search results
Hello,
In our current setup we have 2 cores. First core contains hotel
content information and second core contains pricing information.
I was looking for a way to combine this information at query time so that I can
filter / sort results by price.
Is there any way to do this. An
Hey Guys,
I need to filter out some results based on who is performing the
search. In other words, if a document is not accessible to a user
performing search, I don't want it to be in the result set. What is
the best/easiest way to do this reliable/securely in Solr?
Thanks
--
Aseem
, NER, IR
- Original Message
From: Alexey Serba ase...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 5:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: sanizing/filtering query string for security
BTW, I have not used DisMax handler yet, but does it handle *:*
properly?
See q.alt
passed as query to solr.
Not allowing * and ? as first char is only thing I can thing of right
now. Anything else it should somehow handle.
I am not able to find any relevant document.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sanizing-filtering-query-string-for-security
relevant document.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sanizing-filtering-query-string-for-security-tp21516844p26271891.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sanizing-filtering-query
, November 9, 2009 4:59:33 PM
Subject: Re: sanizing/filtering query string for security
Sounds like a nice approach you have done. BTW, I have not used DisMax
handler yet, but does it handle *:* properly? IOW, do you care if users
issue this query, or does DisMax treat this query string
char is only thing I can thing of right
now. Anything else it should somehow handle.
I am not able to find any relevant document.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sanizing-filtering-query-string-for-security-tp21516844p26271891.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
passed as query to solr.
Not allowing * and ? as first char is only thing I can thing of right
now. Anything else it should somehow handle.
I am not able to find any relevant document.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sanizing-filtering-query-string-for-security
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 5:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: sanizing/filtering query string for security
BTW, I have not used DisMax handler yet, but does it handle *:* properly?
See q.alt DisMax parameter
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#q.alt
You can specify
Hi Cody,
I have tried using MLT as a search component so that it has access to
filter queries (via fq) but I cannot seem to get it to give me any
data other than more of the same, that is, I can get a ton of Articles
back but not other content types.
Filter query ( fq ) should work, for
I am trying to use MoreLikeThis (both the component and handler,
trying combinations) and I would like to give it an input document
reference which has a source field to analyze and then get back
other documents which have a given field that is used by MLT.
My dataset is composed of documents
Hi Olivier,
are the facet counts on the urls you dont want 0?
if so you can use facet.mincount to only return results greater than 0.
-Mike
Olivier H. Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I have a multi-valued field, let's call it article_outlinks containing
all
Hi Mike,
No, my problem is that the field article_outlinks is multivalued thus it
contains several urls not related to my search. I would like to facet
only urls matching my query.
For exemple(only on one document, but my search targets over 1M docs):
Doc1:
article_url:
url1.com/1
You could post-process the response and remove urls that don't match your
domain pattern.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Olivier H. Beauchesne oliv...@olihb.comwrote:
Hi Mike,
No, my problem is that the field article_outlinks is multivalued thus it
contains several urls not related to my
yeah, but then I would have to retrieve *a lot* of facets. I think for
now i'll retrieve all the subdomains with facet.prefix and then merge
those queries. Not ideal, but when I will have more motivation, I will
submit a patch to solr :-)
Michael a écrit :
You could post-process the response
when I will have more motivation, I will submit a patch to solr :-)
You want to add more here?- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Olivier H. Beauchesne oliv...@olihb.comwrote:
yeah, but then I would have to retrieve *a lot* of
Hi,
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I have a multi-valued field, let's call it article_outlinks containing
all outgoing urls from a document. I want to get all matching urls
sorted by counts.
For exemple, I want to get all outgoing wikipedia url in my documents
sorted by counts.
So
=onlynounan elphant is an animal/field
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr.StopFilterFactory-not-filtering-words-tp25123903p25138502.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory words=stopwords.txt
ignoreCase=true/
/analyzer
/fieldtype
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr.StopFilterFactory-not-filtering-words-tp25123903p25139099.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
an and is from the phrase.
Any idea why
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr.StopFilterFactory-not-filtering-words-tp25123903p25123903.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:58 PM, darnizrnizamud...@edmunds.com wrote:
HI
i dont understand whats wrong here.
i am trying to implement solr.StopFilterFactory
here is my field type definition
fieldtype name=teststop class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
solutions for this, both with shortcomings.
1) I could create a field for each metadata category. So the schema would
have the fields tag_person and tag_place. The problem with this method
is that I am limited to filtering by a single criterion for each of my
queries.
2) I could leave the Solr schema
metadata category. So the schema would
have the fields tag_person and tag_place. The problem with this method
is that I am limited to filtering by a single criterion for each of my
queries.
2) I could leave the Solr schema unmodified and post-process the query.
This solution is less elegant than one
with shortcomings.
1) I could create a field for each metadata category. So the schema would
have the fields tag_person and tag_place. The problem with this method
is that I am limited to filtering by a single criterion for each of my
queries.
2) I could leave the Solr schema unmodified
)
-Hoss
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24530267.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: At least in trunk, if you request for:
: http://localhost:8084/solr/core_A/mlt?q=id:7468365fq=price[100 TO 200]
: It will filter the MoreLikeThis results
I think a big part of the confusion people have about this is the
distinction between the MLT RequestHandler, and the MLT SearchComponent.
to retrieve the target for similarity
comparison,
it appears there is no way to filter MLT results. BTW. I am using Solr
1.3.
Please let me know if there is way (other than hacking the source code)
to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis
(other than hacking the source code)
to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http
://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24369257.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results
,
it appears there is no way to filter MLT results. BTW. I am using
Solr
1.3.
Please let me know if there is way (other than hacking the source
code)
to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
(other than hacking the source
code)
to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message
comparison,
it appears there is no way to filter MLT results. BTW. I am using Solr 1.3.
Please let me know if there is way (other than hacking the source code) to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from
know if there is way (other than hacking the source code) to
do this. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filtering-MoreLikeThis-results-tp24360355p24360355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Ensdorf Ken [ensd...@zoominfo.com]
Inviato: venerdì 22 maggio 2009 18.16
A: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Oggetto: RE: Filtering query terms
When I try testing the filter solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory I get
different results calling the following urls:
1. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core
Hi,
I am experiencing problems using filters.
I'm using the following version of Solr:
solr/nightly of 2009-04-12
The part of the schema.xml I'm using for setting filters is the following:
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
When I try testing the filter solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory I get
different results calling the following urls:
1. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core-
name]/select/?q=all%3Apapaversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
2. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core-
]
Inviato: venerdì 22 maggio 2009 18.16
A: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Oggetto: RE: Filtering query terms
When I try testing the filter solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory I get
different results calling the following urls:
1. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core-
name]/select/?q=all%3Apapaversion
@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:27:45 PM
Subject: R: Filtering query terms
Thank you very much for the instantaneous support.
I couldn't find the conflict for hours :(
When I have a response for the ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory I will write
Hi
We have a need to filter and rank a queryset outside of solr (its a
specialised spatial search) and then restrict the solr search based on
that filter.
Previously we were doing our filter, then passing a set of primary
keys to solr like so:
q = '(aerial photos) AND (pk:123^1.8 OR pk:163^1.2
Is it possible to filter similarities found by the MLT component/
handler? Something like mlt.fq=site_id:86?
We have 32 cores in our Solr install, and some of those cores have up
to 8 sites indexed in them. Typically those cores will have one very
large site with a few hundred thousand
AM
Subject: MoreLikeThis filtering
Is it possible to filter similarities found by the MLT component/handler?
Something like mlt.fq=site_id:86?
We have 32 cores in our Solr install, and some of those cores have up to 8
sites
indexed in them. Typically those cores will have one very
301 - 400 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
