RE: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync

2021-02-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Let me add some background. A user triggers an operation which under the : hood needs to update a single field. Atomic update fails with a message : that one of the mandatory fields is missing (which is strange by : itself). When I query Solr for the exact document (fq with the document :

RE: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync

2021-02-07 Thread Nussbaum, Ronen
: יום ב 01 פברואר 2021 22:58 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync To expand on what Jason suggested, if the issue is the non-deterministic ordering due to staggered commits per replica, you may have more consistency with TLOG replicas rather than the NRT

Re: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync

2021-02-01 Thread Mike Drob
To expand on what Jason suggested, if the issue is the non-deterministic ordering due to staggered commits per replica, you may have more consistency with TLOG replicas rather than the NRT replicas. In this case, the underlying segment files should be identical and lead to more predictable

Re: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync

2021-02-01 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Forgot to answer your second question: > Can I trigger the "fixing" mechanism that Solr runs at restart by an API call > or some other method? It depends on what the cause is. But for at least some possible causes there is an API call that can resolve this. Though that API itself (Solr's

Re: Ghost Documents or Shards out of Sync

2021-02-01 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Hi Ronen, The first thing I'd figure out in your situation is whether the results are actually different each time, or whether the ordering is what differs (which might push a particular result off the page you're looking at, giving the appearance that it didn't match). In the case of the