, Robert [mailto:robert.peter...@mail.rakuten.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
Good info, Thanks Hoss! I was going to add a more specific fl=
parameter
to my queries at the same time
to be indexed but don't require them to be
stored right?
-Original Message-
From: Petersen, Robert [mailto:robert.peter...@mail.rakuten.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
Good info
: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
: index? I noticed I am unnecessarily storing some fields in my index and
: I'd like to stop storing them without having to 'reindex the world' and
: let
(13/04/24 7:09), Petersen, Robert wrote:
Hi guys,
What would happen if I changed a field definition on an existing field in an
existing index from stored to not stored? Would solr just party on ignoring
the fact that this field's data is stored in the current index? I noticed I am
: index? I noticed I am unnecessarily storing some fields in my index and
: I'd like to stop storing them without having to 'reindex the world' and
: let the changes just naturally percolate into my index as updates come
: in the normal course of things. Do you guys think I could get away
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
: index? I noticed I am unnecessarily storing some fields in my index and
: I'd like to stop storing them without having to 'reindex the world' and
: let the changes just naturally percolate
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
Good info, Thanks Hoss! I was going to add a more specific fl= parameter to my
queries at the same time. Currently I am doing fl=*,score so that will have to
be changed.
-Original Message
