and minimizes index size;
precisionStep=8 (the default) enables efficient range queries.'
Does this mean sorting performance will suffer for precisionStep values other
than 0?
Cheers,
Dennis
, the documentation for TrieDateField says:
'precisionStep=0 enables efficient date sorting and minimizes index size;
precisionStep=8 (the default) enables efficient range queries.'
Does this mean sorting performance will suffer for precisionStep values other
than 0?
No, sorting speed is unaffected
, the precisionStep value only affects range
query performance and index size.
However, the documentation for TrieDateField says:
'precisionStep=0 enables efficient date sorting and minimizes index
size; precisionStep=8 (the default) enables efficient range queries.'
Does this mean sorting performance
= in the query
to
achieve the same functionality? Any particular way to index the data to
achieve the same result? any idea to boost the performance and get the
intended functionality?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-performance-tp3987633.html
Sent
functionality?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-performance-tp3987632.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
functionality?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-performance-tp3987633.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache could be acceptable if I do it a
few
times
: per
Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache could be acceptable if I do it a few
PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache could be acceptable if I do it a few
times
: per
Janicki
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So
I'm now considering if Solr (Lucene) is a good choice when we have a
huge number of indexed document and a large number of new documents
needs to be indexed everyday.
Maybe I'm wrong, but my feeling is that the way the sort caches are
handled (recreated after new commit, not shared between
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache could be acceptable if I do it a few times
: per day. But not on a too regular basis (right now, the first query that loads
: the cache takes 150s).
it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M
- Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and
indexed fields
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a
few milliseconds. (I
value are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and
indexed fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score
in a few milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747 matched documents)
This one
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:28:23 +0300
christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hum. this mean I have to wait before I index new documents and avoid
indexing when they are created (I have about 50 000 new documents
created each day and I was planning to make those searchable ASAP).
you can
The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
continuous flow of document coming in.
So a delay in warming up a cache could be acceptable if I do it a few
times per day. But not on a too regular basis (right now, the first
query that loads the cache takes 150s).
Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
christophe wrote:
When I start indexing new documents, searches are taking long time
again: is the sort cache flushed when new documents are indexed ?
When you
are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some
: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and
indexed fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a
few milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747
it?
You got an OOM? What -Xmx value are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a few
milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747 matched documents)
This one: text:sometext;id desc takes
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a few
milliseconds
26 matches
Mail list logo
