Re: Log levels setting

2008-04-30 Thread David Smiley @MITRE.org
I agree with you Jerome. It seems to me that the SolrCore.execute() should log at DEBUG level (aka FINE in JUL parlance), not INFO. I too don't want to raise the log level to WARN which would throw out the baby with the bath water. For now, I'm just going to modify SolrCore line 958 since I'm

Multiple open SegmentReaders?

2008-04-30 Thread Matthew Runo
Hello! In using the SVN head version of Solr, I've found that recently we started getting multiple open SegmentReaders, all registered... etc.. Any ideas why this would happen? They don't go away unless the server is restarted, and don't go away with commits, etc. In fact, commits seem

Re: Multiple open SegmentReaders?

2008-04-30 Thread Yonik Seeley
Hmmm, if there is a bug, odds are it's due to multicore stuff - probably nothing else has touched core stuff like that recently. Can you reproduce (or rather help others to reproduce) with the solr/example setup? -Yonik On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

access control list

2008-04-30 Thread Kevin Osborn
I have an index of about 3,000,000 products and about 8500 customers. Each customers has access to about 50 to about 500,000 of the products. Our current method was using a bitset in the filter. So, for each customer, they have a bitset in the cache. For each docId that they have access to, the

Re: access control list

2008-04-30 Thread Mike Klaas
On 30-Apr-08, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote: I have an index of about 3,000,000 products and about 8500 customers. Each customers has access to about 50 to about 500,000 of the products. Our current method was using a bitset in the filter. So, for each customer, they have a bitset in

Re: access control list

2008-04-30 Thread Ken Krugler
I have an index of about 3,000,000 products and about 8500 customers. Each customers has access to about 50 to about 500,000 of the products. Our current method was using a bitset in the filter. So, for each customer, they have a bitset in the cache. For each docId that they have access to,

MultiCore on Wiki

2008-04-30 Thread Lance Norskog
The MultiCore writeup on the Wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore) says: ... Configuration-core-dataDir The data directory for a given core. (optional) How can a core not have its own dataDir? What happens if this is not set? Cheers, Lance Norskog

Re: MultiCore on Wiki

2008-04-30 Thread Ryan McKinley
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: The MultiCore writeup on the Wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore ) says: ... Configuration-core-dataDir The data directory for a given core. (optional) How can a core not have its own dataDir? What happens if this is not

RE: MultiCore on Wiki

2008-04-30 Thread Norskog, Lance
I think I meant: this writeup implies to me that two cores could share the same default index. I don't see how this would work, or be useful. Thanks, Lance Norskog -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 9:30 PM To:

Re: MultiCore on Wiki

2008-04-30 Thread Ryan McKinley
by default, each core has its own data (and index) you *could* configure it to share the same data. The catch is you would need to be careful that only one core is writing to the index . It is potentially useful in some rare cases... On May 1, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Norskog, Lance wrote: I