Hi Mihails,
The solr home is a directory which contains the conf/ and data/ folders. The
conf folder contains solrconfig.xml, schema.xml and other such configuration
files. The data/ folder contains the index files.
Other than adding the war file to tomcat, you also need to designate a
certain
I'm stuck...
I now have /tomcat5.5/webapps/solr (exploded solr.war),
/tomcat5.5/webapps/solr/solr-example/.
I've ran
export
JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS-Dsolr.solr.home=/usr/share/tomcat5.5/webapps/solr/example/solr/
to make /example/solr/ as a home directory.
What am I doing wrong?
Quoting Shalin
Thanks a million for your time and help.
It indeed works smoothly now.
I also, by the way, had to apply the patch attached to the
following message :
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-to-describe-2-entities-in-dataConfig-
for-the-DataImporter--p17577610.html
in order to have the
We are cutting a a patch which incorporates all the recent bug fixes,
so that you guys do not have to apply patches over patches
--Noble
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Nicolas Pastorino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a million for your time and help.
It indeed works smoothly now.
I also,
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-
Version 3175 (20080611) __
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
Solr allows you to specify filters in separate parameters that are
applied to the main query, but cached separately.
q=the user queryfq=folder:f13fq=folder:f24
I've been wanting more explanation around this for a while, so maybe now
is a good time to ask :)
the cached separately verbiage
Ok, let's start again from scratch with a clean Tomcat installation.
1. Download example-solr-home.jar from the wiki and extract it to a local
folder for example to /home/your_username/
2. You will now see a folder called example-solr-home where you extracted
the jar file in the above step
3.
Exception in Lucene Index Updater.
Anyway, for some reasons I'm able to start Solr only using its own
Jetty. Everything else works fine on my Tomcat, except Solr.
Quoting Shalin Shekhar Mangar : Ok, let's start again from scratch
with a clean Tomcat installation.
1. Download
Hi,
I'm using solr built from trunk and highlighting for range queries doesn't
work.
If I search for 2008 everything works as expected but if I search for
[2000 TO 2008] nothing gets highlighted.
The field I'm searching on is a TextField and I've confirmed that the query
and index analyzers are
Shalin,
Thanks for consolidating the patch.
Any idea, when the dB Import request handler will be part of the nightly
build?
Thanks again
** julio
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Julio,
That was fast! I just uploaded a patch :)
Actually, it is waiting on SOLR-563 (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-563) which deals with modifying
the build scripts to create a contrib project area in Solr. I'm planning to
work on that this week. Once that is done, it would be
It's a known deficiency... ConstantScoreRangeQuery and
ConstantScorePrefixQuery which Solr uses rewrite to a
ConstantScoreQuery and don't expose the terms they match.
Performance-wise it seems like a bad idea if the number of terms
matched is large (esp when used in a MultiSearcher or later in
Hi,
Does SOLR have .csv output? I can find references to .csv input, but
not output.
Thank you,
Marshall
Hi Marshall,
I don't think there is a CSV Writer, but here are some pointers for writing one:
$ ff \*Writer\*java | grep -v Test | grep request
./src/java/org/apache/solr/request/PHPResponseWriter.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/request/XSLTResponseWriter.java
I recommend using the OpenCSV package. Works fine, Apache 2.0 license.
http://opencsv.sourceforge.net/
wunder
On 6/11/08 10:00 AM, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marshall,
I don't think there is a CSV Writer, but here are some pointers for writing
one:
$ ff \*Writer\*java
Hi,
I've just changed the stemming algorithm slightly and am running a few
tests against the old stemmer versus the new stemmer. I did a query
for 'hanger' and using the old stemmer I get the following scoring for
a document with the title: Converter Hanger Assembly Replacement
6.4242806
We are using Solr as the search engine for our public access library
catalog. In testing I did a search for a French movie that I know is in
the catalog named: Kirikou et la sorcière and nothing was returned.
If I search for just the work Kirikou several results are returned,
and the
When I was asked for something similar I quickly cobbled together a
stylesheet (I'm no xsl expert so it's probably pretty bad).
Invoked like this:
http://localhost:8982/solr/select?q=testingfl=id,title_t,scorewt=xslttr=csv.xslrows=10
YMMV, but feel free to use it if it helps, I've attached
That is strange... did you re-index or change the index? If so, you
might want to verify that docid=3454 still corresponds to the same
document you queried earlier.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Brendan Grainger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just changed the stemming algorithm
Hi Yonik,
Yes I did rebuild the index and they are the same document (just
verified). The only thing that changed was the stemmer, but that makes
no sense to me. Also, if the equation for the fieldNorm is:
fieldBoost * lengthNorm = fieldBoost * 1 /sqrt(numTermsForField)
Then that would
Sure, use the fl parameter to specify the fields that you want
(comma-separated)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Yves Zoundi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
Is it possible to remove some fields from the XML response?
I have a field which can contains a huge amount of data
Yves - you can control which fields are returned from a search using
the fl (field list) parameter. fl=* provides all fields except
score. fl=id,title,score provides only those selected fields, etc.
Erik
On Jun 11, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Yves Zoundi wrote:
Hi guys,
Is
Hi Yonik,
I just realized that the stemmer does make a difference because of
synonyms. So on indexing using the new stemmer converter hanger
assembly replacement gets expanded to: converter hanger assembly
assemble replacement so there are 5 terms which gets a length norm of
0.4472136
Thank you guys!
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 11 juin 2008 14:07
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Ignore fields in XML response
Yves - you can control which fields are returned from a search using
the fl (field list) parameter.
Field norms have limited precision (it's encoded as an 8 bit float) so
you are probably seeing rounding.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Brendan Grainger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yonik,
I just realized that the stemmer does make a difference because of synonyms.
So on indexing
Thanks so much, that explains it.
Brendan
On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Field norms have limited precision (it's encoded as an 8 bit float) so
you are probably seeing rounding.
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Brendan Grainger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yonik,
I
Hi Robert,
Did you rebuild the index after changing your config? The index time
analyzer is only applied when a document is indexed, changing it has no
effect on already indexed documents.
Tom
Robert Haschart wrote:
We are using Solr as the search engine for our public access library
Hi,
I've noticed that currently the SynonymFilter replaces the original
token with the configured tokens list (which includes the original
matched token) and each one of these tokens is of type word. Wouldn't
it make more sense to only mark the original token as type word and
the the other
Hi,
The product I'm working on requires new documents to be searchable
very quickly (inside 60 seconds is my goal). The corpus is also going
to grow very large, although it is perfectly partitionable by user.
The approach I tried first was to have write-only masters and read-
only slaves
Hi Uri,
Yes, I think that would make sense (word vs. synonym token types). Custom
boosting/weighting of original token vs. synonym token(s) also makes sense. Is
this something you can provide a patch for?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original
Hi James,
Yes, this makes sense. I've recommended doing the same to others before. It
would be good to have this be a part of Solr. There is one person (named
Jason) working on adding more real-time search support to both Lucene and Solr.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene
It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often since it will be cached
separately from the query. The first query occuppies one cache entry while
the second one occuppies two cache entries, one in queryCache and one in
Just correct myself, in the last setence, the first query is better if
fieldb:bar isn't reused often
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:02 PM, climbingrose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often since
Hi,
I am new to Solr Lucene I have only one defaule core i am working on creating
multiple core.
Can you help me in this matter.
with regards
nbsp;Rohit Arora
--- On Thu, 6/12/08, James Brady lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: James Brady lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Strategy for
Hi,
I'm playing with the Solr Data Import Handler, and everything looks
great so far!
Hopefully we will be able to replace our homegrown ODBC indexing service
[using camping+ferret] with Solr!
The wiki page mentions scheduling full imports and delta imports but I
couldn't find any further
35 matches
Mail list logo
