Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
remove the file create by the failed CREATE command?
-
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-creating-collection-using-CORE-API-tp4051156.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
is always 1
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Too-many-fields-to-Sort-in-Solr-tp4049139p4050944.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
to be sending the same query
needlessly around the cluster 36 times - seems unnecessary.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Tim
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
, then all nodes are going to be sending the same query
needlessly around the cluster 36 times - seems unnecessary.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Tim
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
cloud
than the rest of us know ;-)
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah, interesting. Forgot about doing that issue entirely.
- Mark
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran a quick test and distrib=false
of it in any form whatsoever. If you have
received this message in error please notify postmas...@etisalat.ae by
email immediately and delete the message without making any copies.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
-tp4049139p4052036.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
for your support.
Aditya
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Too-many-fields-to-Sort-in-Solr-tp4049139p4052091.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918p4052122.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
there is
a ton of inventory, so even if you use a small boost for inventory,
when the intentory is very large, that will overpower the title boost,
no?
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you
/n4052131/solrconfig.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Too-many-fields-to-Sort-in-Solr-tp4049139p4052131.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
-in-Solr-tp4049139p4052374.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
(
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SOLR-3939https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939
) prevents me from using 4.0 in this scenario.
If you need anything else, please just say so.
Thanks for your help
Kind Regards
Alexander
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services
startup with collection1 in solr.xml it's best to startup the
initial Solr instance with the bootstrap-conf parameter so Solr can
properly create this collection.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
The steps that I use to setup the collection are slightly
...,
which I would like to avoid.
Also what I don't understand, why my steps work in 4.0 but won't in
4.2.1...
Any clues ?
Kind Regards
Alexander
Am 2013-04-08 19:12, schrieb Joel Bernstein:
The steps that I use to setup the collection are slightly different:
1) Start zk and upconfig
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/dataimporthandler-does-not-distribute-documents-on-solr-cloud-tp4058248.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
Actually, it is Solr 4.1+ where the implicit router will be used if
nuShards is not specified.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
What version of Solr a re you using? In Solr 4.2+ if you don't specify
numShards when creating the collection, the implicit
. I
actually what to know which class in solr directly calls the lucene
Index
Searcher .
Thanks.
Pom
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
only by the node that I run that query on?
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
be directed to one particular shard (eg. the
current
month shard) and having increased query capacity in that shard would be
useful... this could be extended to many use cases such as data hashed
by
organization, type, etc.
Thanks,
steve
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional
shards, 10 replicas). I have couple
questions on shard key.
1. Looking at the admin GUI, how do I know which field is being
used for shard key.
2. What is the default shard key used?
3. How do I override the default shard key?
Thanks.
--
Joel Bernstein
,
smallSetsDeferred:115,
toSetDocsAdded:24742}},
Via profiler and debugger, I see 150 msec spent in the outer
'while(term!=null)' loop in: JoinQueryWeight.getDocSet(). This seems
like a
lot of time to join the bitsets. Does this seem right?
Peter
--
Joel
Hi,
Can the account JoelBernstein be granted permission to edit the Solr Wiki?
Thanks,
Joel
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure :) I've added it to https://wiki.apache.org/solr/AdminGroup
-Stefan
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
Can the account JoelBernstein be granted permission
Sandeep,
This type of operation can often be expressed as a PostFilter very
efficiently. This is particularly true if the region id's are integer keys.
Joel
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Sandeep Gupta sandy@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have a Solr index of around 100 million documents
Mathias,
I'd have to do a close review of the function sort code to be sure, but I
suspect if you implement the equals() method on the ValueSource it should
solve your caching issue. Also implement hashCode().
Joel
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On
be an alternate in
my case and whether if its possible to apply as a patch in 4.4 version.
Any pointer will be appreciated.
- Thanks,
Shamik
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
:
http://yonik.com/posts/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/
Thanks,
Shawn
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
-question-tp4100938.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
a lot in advance,
Thomas Seidl
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
are rendered fast.
Is there any way to improve the facet counting using other methods?
Thanks
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
have any idea how
to extend it for edismax or do you have any idea what to do for my case.
*PS:* I've sent same question at Lucene user list too. I ask it here to
get an idea from Solr perspective too.
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
dev. being done on adding custom sorting (after
collection) via a plugin?
Thanks,
Peter
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
E-mail ... pol...@townnews.com
Phone 309-743-0809
Fax .. 309-743-0830
--
Patrick O'Lone
Director of Software Development
TownNews.com
E-mail ... pol...@townnews.com
Phone 309-743-0809
Fax .. 309-743-0830
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer
| www.tai-dev.co.uk
http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/*
daniel.bry...@tai-dev.co.uk mailto:daniel.bry...@tai-dev.co.uk | +44
(0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk https://twitter.com/taidevcouk
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
PriorityQueue (and a local duplicate of HitQueue), but
should
work. I think a better design would hide the PQ from the plugin.
Thanks,
Peter
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Peter,
I've been meaning to revisit configurable ranking
,
QParser).getValues()
But, 'getValueSource' needs a QParser, which isn't available.
And I can't create a QParser without a SolrQueryRequest, which isn't
available.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter
to be a bit of profiling to
see if they are heavy enough to make the CPU the bottleneck.
Regards,
Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
segments ..
Have anyone else faced the same issue ?
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
--
---
Thanks Regards
Umesh Prasad
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
solution.
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
SOLR-5020 has the commit info, it's mainly changes to SolrIndexSearcher
I
believe. They might apply to 4.3.
I think as long you have the finish method that's all you'll need. If
you
can
and caching,
custom collectors, and post filters, there's a lot of flexibility here.
Btw, the query times using a custom collector to scale/recompute scores is
excellent (will have to see how it compares to your outlined solution).
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Joel Bernstein
.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-cloud-deleting-and-adding-the-same-doc-tp4107111.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
the rest api until the client has
gotten them all?
Thanks
Robi
--
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
at 6:45 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
SOLR-5244 is also working in this direction. This focuses on efficient
binary extract of entire search results.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoss is working on it. Search
?
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks, I agree this powerful stuff. One of the reasons that I haven't
gotten back to pluggable collectors is that I've been using PostFilters
instead.
When you start doing stuff
I would suggest handling this in the client. You could write custom Solr
code also but it would be more complicated because you'd be working with
Solr's API's.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM, jmlucjav jmluc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have
occurring.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Greg Preston gpres...@marinsoftware.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm loading up our solr cloud with data (from a solrj client) and
running into a weird memory issue. I can reliably reproduce the
problem
to 15 second commits, and then
kill the Solr instance between the commits. Then watch the memory as the
replaying occurs with the smaller tlog.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Greg Preston gpres...@marinsoftware.comwrote:
Hi Joel
and it will have a similar interaction
between a PostFilter and value source. So you may want to watch SOLR-5536
to see an example of this.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel,
Could
Yeah, sounds like a leak might be there. Having the huge tlog might have
just magnified it's importance.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Greg Preston gpres...@marinsoftware.comwrote:
Interesting. In my original post, the memory growth (during
Kranti,
The range query also looks like a good candidate to be moved to a filter
query so it can be cached.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Kranti,
I can't speak to the specific slow-down while
Craig,
Can you describe the steps you are using to create the core?
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Craig Longman clong...@iconect.com wrote:
We're exploring using Solr as a search/faceting engine, and things went
quite well during
having QA take a crack at it that it's not working.
All three have the same config, checked pretty thoroughly, although our
next step is for me to setup a fourth machine personally and see what
happens.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Bernstein [mailto:joels...@gmail.com]
Sent: January 8
suspect the solr.xml is driving this,
so take a look and see how they are different between the server that is
working and not working.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Craig Longman clong...@iconect.com wrote:
On the dev machine, it works
/4_6_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/core/CorePropertiesLocator.html
.
So, I'm betting the machines not writing the core properties file are using
the old style solr.xml.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig
You do need to load balance the initial query request across the SolrCloud
nodes. Solj's CloudSolrServer and LBHttpSolrServer can perform the load
balancing for you in the client. Or you can use a hardware load balancer.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58
on the same shard.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay sham...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade to Solr 4.6 to move from using Result Grouping to
CollapsingQParserPlugin. I'm currently using SolrCloud, couple
Also, there are a number of bugs in the CollapsingQParserPlugin in Solr 4.6
that are resolved in Solr 4.6.1 which should be out soon.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
Shamik,
You still need to keep docs
Something is off but I'm not sure what. A couple of questions.
1) You mention updating the solr.xml. Did you the schema.xml?
2) Did you load only those 4 docs?
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay sham...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
,
incubationdate_dt:2006-01-17T00:00:00Z,
adskdedup_s:MNOP-QRS,
_version_:1457264913752784896}]
}}
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
Something is off but I'm not sure what. A couple
,
price:0.0,
price_c:0,USD,
popularity:10,
inStock:true,
incubationdate_dt:2006-01-17T00:00:00Z,
adskdedup_s:MNOP-QRS,
_version_:1457264913752784896}]
}}
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Joel Bernstein
, when are you planning to release 4.6.1 ?
There is a thread going on the dev list about the 4.6.1 release. You can
follow progress at:
http://markmail.org/search/?q=%22Lucene+%2F+Solr+4.6.1%22
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:35 AM, shamik sham...@gmail.com
If you're on Solr 4.6 then this is likely the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260.
The issue is resolved for Solr 4.6.1 which should be out next week.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nathan Neulinger nn...@neulinger.orgwrote
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Jeff Wartes jwar...@whitepages.com wrote:
Got it in one. Thanks!
On 2/11/14, 9:50 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/11/2014 10:21 AM, Jeff Wartes wrote:
I¹m working on a port of a Solr
explicitly committing after each document, your commits will happen
too frequently, overworking the indexing process.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Pisarev, Vitaliy vitaliy.pisa...@hp.comwrote:
I am running a very simple performance experiment where I
cause this can be faster, especially when result sets are relatively small
but the index is large.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Tri Cao tm...@me.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am running a Solr application and I would need to implement a feature
are protecting against an NPE. In 4.6 and 4.6.1 the NPE check is not
present. So the issue may be resolved in trunk and 4x.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Lajos la...@protulae.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just want to verify that it is no longer possible
is that the elevated
document becomes the group head. We can discuss the best way to handle this
on the new ticket.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:29 PM, dboychuck dboych...@build.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5773
I am having trouble
fine
using standard grouping.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Joe Ho j...@basistech.com wrote:
I notice that in Solr 4.6.1 CollapsingQParserPlugin is slower than standard
Solr field grouping. I have a Solr index of 1 docs, with a signature
post the full debug output for both queries?
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:22 PM, shamik sham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded to 4.7, with the aim of replacing group queries with
CollapsingQParserPlugin. As I'm comparing results
query for specific facets if you want to see
facet counts for the un-collapsed result set.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:05 PM, tchaffee tchaf...@livingnaturally.comwrote:
Should the same exact query using fq={!collapse field=fld} return the same
Hi Shamik,
I see that you are using distributed search. With the
CollapsingQParserPlugin you need to have all the documents that are in the
same group on the same shard.
Is that the way you have the documents indexed?
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014
It sounds like you can make it work with the frange qparser plugin:
fq={!frange l=0 u=0}sub(field(a),field(b))
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Uhhhm, did you look at function queries at all
Aman,
You may want to try the Heliosearch Distribution For Solr. This is a free,
pre-built Tomcat/Solr distro.
http://heliosearch.com/download.html
When you open up the zip file there is an examples.txt file in server/bin
that has a couple SolrCloud examples.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search
Are you talking about static warming queries, which you define as
newSearcher and firstSearcher events? If so, you should see all three
queries in the log. If you're still having the issue, can you post your
warming query configuration?
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, May
Take a look at Solr's use of DocValues:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/DocValues.
There are docValues options that use less memory then the FieldCache.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Jeongseok Son invictu...@gmail.com wrote
you'll be able to implement your own MergeStrategy, to merge
the results generated by DelegatingCollectors on the shards (SOLR-5973).
The pluggable collectors in that ticket are for ranking. The PostFilter
delegating collectors are a better place for doing custom analytics.
Joel Bernstein
You may want to investigate the group.func option. This would allow you to
plug in your own logic to return the group by key. I don't think there is
an existing function that does exactly what you need so you may have to
write a custom function.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
)
at org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.create(SolrIndexWriter.java:64)
It looks like the new collection is using the same data dir as an existing
collection. This startup param might be the issue:
export JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -Dsolr.data.dir=/ebs-data/solr/data
at
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed
that
don't have a group you can place a null in the group field and use the
expand nullPolicy, which will place each null group record in it's own
group. Using the nullPolicy like this will be much more memory efficient
then placing a fake group id in the grouping field.
Joel Bernstein
Search
the
collapsingqparserplugin.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon
jean-sebastien.vac...@wantedanalytics.com wrote:
Yes we are already using it.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent
Reposting this from jira ticket to users list:
I'm noticing a very weird bug using the CollapsingQParserPlugin. We tried
to use this plugin when we realized that faceting on the groups would take
a ridiculous amount of time. To its credit, it works very quickly, however
the facet counts that it
The CollapsingQParserPlugin should give you the same facet counts as
group.truncate.
You're using group.facets, which the CollapsingQParserplugin doesn't yet
support. I think this would be an excellent feature, so we could make a
jira ticket to add this feature.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer
With tag and exclude you can get the facets counts for the collapsed set
and expanded set in the same query. But group.facets is a different count
then either of those.
group.facets counts each facet bucket once per group.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1
The mergeIds method of the QueryComponent does the actual merging of the
docs from the shards.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Phanindra R phani...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In Solr in Action book, I read how the distributed queries work. Looks
values for documents that
match the query, so it won't be a full table scan unless all the docs match
the query.
Sounds like an interesting project. Please keep us posted.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Robert Krüger krue...@lesspain.de wrote:
Hi
Not sure if this helps but it Solr 4.9, there is a new feature called
RankQueries. You can read about it here:
http://heliosearch.org/solrs-new-rankquery-feature/. Solr's new
ReRankingQParserPlugin is built off of RankQueries.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014
In Solr 4.9 there is a feature called RankQueries, that allows you to
plugin your own ranking collector. So, if you wanted to write a
ranking/sorting collector that used a thread per segment, you could cleanly
plug it in.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9
You may have to implement this yourself. In Solr 4.9 you'll be able to
implement your own analytic functions in java and plug them in using the
AnalyticsQuery API. This is a new Solr API for plugging in custom
analytics.
http://heliosearch.org/solrs-new-analyticsquery-api/
Joel Bernstein
Search
Yeah, solr-jdbc does look interesting. Has an Apache license as well.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote:
Hello,
I've found https://github.com/kawasima/solr-jdbc recently. Haven't checked
it so
Let's open a new ticket.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch in SOLR-5408 fixes the issue with sorting only for two sort
fields. Sorting still breaks when 3 or more sort fields are used.
I have
two sort critea: cscore(),
which returns the score, would be the primary criteria. The recip of field
x would be the secondary criteria.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Umesh Prasad umesh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Continuing the discussion
1 - 100 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
