SolrJ would require some modification. SolrJ internally uses Jakarta HTTP
Client via Solr's CommonsHttpSolrServer class. It would need to be ported to
a different implementation of SolrServer (the base class), one that uses
java.net.URL. I suggest JavaNetUrlHttpSolrServer.
~ David Smiley
I see. So this is a show stopper for those wanting to use SolrJ with AppEngine.
Any chance this could be added as a Solr issue?
-glen
2009/4/14 Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org:
SolrJ would require some modification. SolrJ internally uses Jakarta HTTP
Client via Solr’s
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Glen Newton glen.new...@gmail.com wrote:
I see. So this is a show stopper for those wanting to use SolrJ with
AppEngine.
Any chance this could be added as a Solr issue?
Yes, commons-httpclient tries to use Socket directly. So it may not work.
It was
I guess SOLR-599 can be easily fixed if we do not implement
Multipart-support (which is non-essential)
--Noble
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Glen Newton glen.new...@gmail.com wrote:
I see. So this is a