Re: [Spacewalk-devel] rpmbuild directories in git

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:27:23PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: Any reason we checked in rpmbuild-perl-DBD-Oracle-git* directories? I've removed them now. I've also changed Makefile.tag-release not to do git add . so they should not be added in the future. I've checked that

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] perl-DBD-Oracle build without tag

2009-01-16 Thread Michael Mraka
Jan Pazdziora wrote: % Hello Dennis, % % I can see that you manually (?) bumped version of perl-DBD-Oracle in % commit 659586abd2a5ab66aed83dd8eed54d997864dee0 and built the result, % without using make tag-minor-release to keep the information in % rel-eng in a sane state. Thus,

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Is Spacewalk Proxy rawhide supposed to work?

2009-01-16 Thread Rob James
Jan, did you ever get this to work? It's been a while since I tried getting proxy up and running (probably shortly after the 0.3 release) but I never got it to work properly. I'd be interested to know if you have any success. -R On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jan Pazdziora

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Moving content of satellite/ around: proposal 1

2009-01-16 Thread Michael Mraka
Jan Pazdziora wrote: % in the satellite/ directory, we have the following packages: % % $ find satellite -name '*.spec' % satellite/admin/spacewalk-admin.spec % satellite/certs/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec % satellite/config/spacewalk-config.spec %

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Is Spacewalk Proxy rawhide supposed to work?

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:12:05AM +, Rob James wrote: Jan, did you ever get this to work? It's been a while since I tried getting proxy up and running (probably shortly after the 0.3 release) but I never got it to work properly. I'd be interested to know if you have any success. Yes,

[Spacewalk-devel] Re: Spacewalk 0.4 is here!

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:43:23PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: * SELinux support added: https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/Features/SELinux I've now updated that page with a short list of hints about how to spot a problem on Spacewalk with SELinux enabled and what could be done

[Spacewalk-devel] Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk 0.4 is here!

2009-01-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: The Spacewalk team is happy to announce the release of Spacewalk 0.4. In a few hours, the repos will be accessible and you can install 0.4 and try it out. FYI: Freshmeat page updated: http://freshmeat.net/projects/spacewalk/?branch_id=76942release_id=292281 --

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: Spacewalk 0.4 BRANCHED

2009-01-16 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:07:46 +0100 Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com wrote: Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: % master = spacewalk 0.5 % SPACEWALK-0.4 = spacewalk 0.4 Why 0.4 branch is called SPACEWALK-0.4 while we have RELEASE-0.2 and

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk 0.4 is here!

2009-01-16 Thread Michael Mraka
Miroslav Suchý wrote: % E. The builds failed: % GenericError: Unable to complete build: release mismatch (build: 1.el5, % rpm: 1) % % Dennis, is it possible that you removed buildsys-macros from % dist-5E-sw-0.4-candidate ? IMO this is a very good reason not to move packages between tags

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Which jabberd in Spacewalk?

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:22:08AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Jan Pazdziora wrote: page. However, jabberd is *not* in EPEL. What are our plans with that thing? Let assume that it is rhetorical question. Rhetorical answer: Upgrade to 2.2.4 and ask maintainer if he can build jabberd for

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk 0.4 is here!

2009-01-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday 16 January 2009 08:47:19 am Michael Mraka wrote: Miroslav Suchý wrote: % E. The builds failed: % GenericError: Unable to complete build: release mismatch (build: 1.el5, % rpm: 1) % % Dennis, is it possible that you removed buildsys-macros from % dist-5E-sw-0.4-candidate ?

[Spacewalk-devel] Re: Spacewalk 0.4 BRANCHED

2009-01-16 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
Michael Mraka wrote: Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: % master = spacewalk 0.5 % SPACEWALK-0.4 = spacewalk 0.4 Why 0.4 branch is called SPACEWALK-0.4 while we have RELEASE-0.2 and RELEASE-0.3 branches? -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat As part of the on going Spacewalk to Satellite

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT (installation issue using make)

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 05:25:39PM +0530, tushar ahuja wrote: 2)I have installed 0.3.version of spacewalk Spacewalk 0.4 was released yesterday. Could you maybe move over to that version, so see if it fixes the issue you see? -- Jan Pazdziora Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT (installation issue using make)

2009-01-16 Thread tushar ahuja
thanks Jan. Sure I will try to upgrade 0.3 to 0.4 .and let you know the result. i am just wondering is this a known issue ,has someone already encountered with this problem ? or i am doing something wrong ? as i am not able to find any thread against this issue at spacewalk-devel list.