[Spacewalk-devel] Re: [PATCH] Experimental fix for inconsistency in generation rule of cloned errata advisory names

2009-02-06 Thread Satoru SATOH
Hi, Sorry, my patch was completely broken. Here is a revised one. I confirmed it works as expected with satellite-5.2.0 at least. I'm not sure about spacewalk but it should be the same, I guess. Could you anyone please look at it? - satoru On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:45:04PM +0900, Satoru

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: PGPORT: Porting tables; contributions needed

2009-02-06 Thread Vikram Rai
I have started working on the following tables: rhnServerActionPackageResult.sql rhnServerActionScriptResult.sql rhnServerAction.sql rhnServerActionVerifyMissing.sql rhnServerActionVerifyResult.sql rhnServerArch.sql rhnServerCacheInfo.sql rhnServerChannelArchCompat_data.sql

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: PGPORT: Porting tables; contributions needed

2009-02-06 Thread Vikram Rai
Hi, Just did a fresh pull and seems like the following are already in the postgres folder. So am leaving them for now: rhnServerAction.sql rhnServerArch_data.sql rhnServerArch.sql rhnServerGroup.sql rhnServerGroupType.sql rhnServer.sql Regards, Vikram Rai On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Vikram

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Re: PGPORT: Porting tables; contributions needed

2009-02-06 Thread Muhammad Farrukh
I've picked up all the rhn_command* tables. Marked in the wiki as well. Regards, Farrukh On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Vikram Rai vra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just did a fresh pull and seems like the following are already in the postgres folder. So am leaving them for now:

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Do I report this as a bug?

2009-02-06 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Devan Goodwin dgood...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:33:58 -0500 (EST) m.roth2...@rcn.com wrote: I've tried to install both the 64-bit version and the 32-bit version, both on

[Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Gurjeet Singh
Hi All, As I mentioned in the last conference call, I could not implement a workaround for CONNECT BY in plpgsql; that was because of a limitation in the way plpgsql handles the pseudo datatype RECORD. So, I turned to implementing it as an add-on in C. But I wanted to actually see how

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Michael Mraka
Gurjeet Singh wrote: % Hi All, % % As I mentioned in the last conference call, I could not implement a % workaround for CONNECT BY in plpgsql; that was because of a limitation in % the way plpgsql handles the pseudo datatype RECORD. ... % and both these instances SELECT the same data: given

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:22:49 +0530 Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Hi All, As I mentioned in the last conference call, I could not implement a workaround for CONNECT BY in plpgsql; that was because of a limitation in the

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Gurjeet Singh
2009/2/6 Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com CONNECT BY creates a tree select. Can the above select with rhn_get_action_prerequisites() handle multi level dependencies as well? I.e. for id prerequisite 1 NULL 2 1 3 1 21

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:37:28 +0530 Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Hmm.. Although that is doable, I haven't thought about that. The way I saw it was that we'd have a IF(ORACLE) CONNECT BY ELSE IF(POSTGRES) CALL FUNCTION END

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Asynchronous SSM UI

2009-02-06 Thread Jason Dobies
Can you add the screenshots to the bugzilla? Good place to reference them later. Will do. You have In Progress and All. Part of me thinks you'd need a Completed one. Ya know, I actually thought about that too, and it's so simple I'll throw it in so we can see how it looks. What if

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Devan Goodwin dgood...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:37:28 +0530 Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Hmm.. Although that is doable, I haven't thought about that. The way I saw it

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] rhn-client-tools with python2.5

2009-02-06 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Lukas Durfina wrote: Hi, I am trying run rhnreg_ks with python2.5. I have this problem: ... File /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/rhn/transports.py, line 225, in parse _response p, u = self.getparser() File /usr/lib/python2.5/xmlrpclib.py, line 1210, in getparser return

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] rhn-client-tools with python2.5

2009-02-06 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
Lukas Durfina wrote: Hi, I am trying run rhnreg_ks with python2.5. I have this problem: [Fri Feb 6 10:08:57 2009] up2date Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/rhnreg_ks, line 266, in module File /usr/sbin/rhnreg_ks, line 90, in main rhnreg.getCaps() File rhnreg.py,

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] commit messages

2009-02-06 Thread Rob James
Looking at the commit logs recently a lot of the linked Bugzilla reports seem to have restricted access - is this just that they are coming from the Satellite QA or is it that they have customer info in? Where possible it would be nice for the community for bug reports to be open access. -R On

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PGPORT: CONNECT BY queries

2009-02-06 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Devan Goodwin dgood...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:22:49 +0530 Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.si...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Hi All, As I mentioned in the last conference call, I could not implement

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] commit messages

2009-02-06 Thread Rob James
In the last 24 hours of commits at least these seem to be restricted: Justin Sherrill [Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:31:49 +] 458943 - fixed issue where having 500 items on a page and clicking confirm would result in page not found Brad Buckingham [Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:16:42 +] 483824 - fix apidoc

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] commit messages

2009-02-06 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:53:29 + Rob James rssja...@googlemail.com wrote: In the last 24 hours of commits at least these seem to be restricted: Justin Sherrill [Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:31:49 +] 458943 - fixed issue where having 500 items on a

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] rhn-client-tools with python2.5

2009-02-06 Thread Lukas Durfina
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Pradeep Kilambi pkila...@redhat.com wrote: Please use the latest rhnlib version. It should already ahve a fix for this. ~ Prad Thanks a lot, now it works ok. ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list