Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
ugh, I hate when we do that :) +1 to using the same one and repackage.
In the short term, could we create one then symlink them to the other places?
It would seem silly to create an rpm package that had just the one file.
*cough* rhnlib?
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat
Justin Sherrill wrote:
Luis Garcia wrote:
Cool. Thanks for getting that added. For now, I used python to call
ssh and ran the results through awk. Nothing fancy, and no doubt
error-prone, but it got the job done. Grabbing the info directly
from a spacewalk will be much more convenient.
Hey
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Justin Sherrill wrote:
Luis Garcia wrote:
Cool. Thanks for getting that added. For now, I used python to call
ssh and ran the results through awk. Nothing fancy, and no doubt
error-prone, but it got the job done. Grabbing the info directly
from a spacewalk will be
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Devan Goodwindgood...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:31:12 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/31 Devan Goodwin dgood...@redhat.com:
Green light to begin testing 0.6, we may still
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Michael Stahnkemastah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Devan Goodwindgood...@redhat.com wrote:
Still Oracle dependencies because we still depend on Oracle. :)
Spacewalk right now would be less than useless without them. The pgsql
merge is
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
Perhaps you could explain this a little more. When I read that the
Postgres Merge happend, I assumed that meant Postgres functionality.
Also, in reading Cliff's notes for Spacewalk 0.6, it looked like
Postgres support was in there. Am I just
Hello all,
Attached is a patch to fix a few issues found in some more thorough testing.
Thanks,
Joshua Roys
From c84573f1bc73693542f6d81370949ba740bc013f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Roys joshua.r...@gtri.gatech.edu
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:26:14 -0400
Subject: Bugfixes for config
Hello all,
Attached is a patch that lets you play around with symlinks through the
config management interface (rhbz#428190). It's a bit of a hack in the
sense that it asks you to put the target of the symlink in the file
contents. Also, a few things are unfinished or don't do what is
