Re: [Spacewalk-devel] 487563 - switching take_snapshots to enable_snapshots

2009-03-05 Thread Brad Buckingham
This is a good question. I'll be working on modifications in the future to make the documentation links configurable. This would be to address the fact that the various help links in Spacewalk are currently dead-links. When I do that, it'll likely be controlled based on properties defined

config constants (Re: [Spacewalk-devel] 487563 - switching take_snapshots to enable_snapshots)

2009-03-05 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Brad Buckingham bbucking...@redhat.com wrote: This is a good question.  I'll be working on modifications in the future to make the documentation links configurable.  This would be to address the fact that the various help links in Spacewalk are currently

[Spacewalk-devel] 487563 - switching take_snapshots to enable_snapshots

2009-03-04 Thread jmrodri
Do we 'really' need constants for EVERY configuration entry? I know it makes a bit easier to use auto-completion in the IDE, but it seems a bit redundant to modify a Config reader class every time. And personally I really dislike the indirection, I always end up with 2 greps one for the config

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] 487563 - switching take_snapshots to enable_snapshots

2009-03-04 Thread Justin Sherrill
jmrodri wrote: Do we 'really' need constants for EVERY configuration entry? I know it makes a bit easier to use auto-completion in the IDE, but it seems a bit redundant to modify a Config reader class every time. And personally I really dislike the indirection, I always end up with 2 greps