Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-07 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:28:09PM -0600, Lamont Peterson wrote: [snip] Well, discussions about renaming all tools and packages to spacewalk- something pop up from time to time for many years ;). Althought we mostly agree with renaming comandline tools (assuming that old names will remain

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-06 Thread Michael Mraka
% Running vanilla Spacewalk on SUSE would be a big effort and %ifdefs in % the spec files (like they are in our tree. /srv/www vs /var/www anyone) % % Why didn't you send those %ifdefs for review? If this is the only % thing which blocks you do do Spacewalk vanilla releases on SUSE, I'm %

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-06 Thread Lamont Peterson
[snip] Well, discussions about renaming all tools and packages to spacewalk- something pop up from time to time for many years ;). Althought we mostly agree with renaming comandline tools (assuming that old names will remain at least as symlinks for compatibility reasons) we've decided not to

[Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-01 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar P.
On 01/08/13 10:05, Jan Pazdziora wrote: Running vanilla Spacewalk on SUSE would be a big effort and %ifdefs in the spec files (like they are in our tree. /srv/www vs /var/www anyone) Why didn't you send those %ifdefs for review? If this is the only thing which blocks you do do Spacewalk