Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
% Sorry guys, I did see this but then promptly forgot about it.
%
% We may need to replace EditArea anyway as the project appears to have
% been abandoned. My emails to the dev have not been returned and there
% is virtually no activity on the EditArea SF site.
%
On 13/02/14 10:10, Michael Mraka wrote:
Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
Hello Duncan,
Thanks for the patch. Currently we focus on Spacewalk 2.1 release so we will
take a look on it after the release.
Makes sense.
I plan to push it for our release. If you see something totally wrong
with it, it
On 01/09/2014 01:26 PM, Matej Kollar wrote:
Major things that we currently consider release blockers for 2.1
from UI point of view are:
[...]
* Bare-metal systems management
May I ask what's the status of that? Is it still planned for 2.1?
More importantly, is there something that
On 13/02/14 15:42, Flavio Castelli wrote:
I just realized I forgot to push this small patch upstream.
Here we go again, I forgot another patch :)
Flavio
From 64c7ed901c1faeb2167251d1e7ca8fe1c9e2c90a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flavio Castelli fcaste...@suse.com
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014
We recently discovered an issue where requests for any pxt page would generate
500 errors. Traced it back to this submitted bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723372
Apache2::Cookie-fetch dies if there is a malformed cookie sent by the browser.
In our case, it was a wildcard
Hello Spacewalk Developers,
After asking the last question I decided to go ahead and make a change of my
own to see if I can improve performance. I was able to improve the query by at
least 6 seconds faster. The old query was taking about 6101 ms to finish where
I my query takes about 161 ms.