Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New records get born in RHNDAEMONSTATE

2011-01-27 Thread Tomas Lestach
On 01/26/2011 08:51 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Tomas Lestach wrote: Right, this approach is really not the best one. As this is a part of the taskomatic, I'll investigate it more in detail. I'd touch the code anyway. Not sure if somebody makes use out

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New records get born in RHNDAEMONSTATE

2011-01-25 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Tomas Lestach wrote: Right, this approach is really not the best one. As this is a part of the taskomatic, I'll investigate it more in detail. I'd touch the code anyway. Not sure if somebody makes use out of the rhnDaemonState table content, but

[Spacewalk-devel] New records get born in RHNDAEMONSTATE

2010-06-15 Thread Jan Pazdziora
Hello, while diffing schema contents of Spacewalk which was installed and started and Spacewalk which was never started (actually, just an old database schema upgraded to latest version), I came across the following inconsistence: select LABEL from RHNDAEMONSTATE order by LABEL

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] New records get born in RHNDAEMONSTATE

2010-06-15 Thread Tomas Lestach
- Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, while diffing schema contents of Spacewalk which was installed and started and Spacewalk which was never started (actually, just an old database schema upgraded to latest version), I came across the following inconsistence: select