On 02/18/2014 09:46 AM, Silvio Moioli wrote:
So all I have is one last question:
Is this your own personal opinion or the whole Spacewalk team official
position? In particular, will future patches be rejected if they have
those trailing slashes?
Oops, typo there. I really meant:
In
Silvio Moioli wrote:
% On 02/17/2014 04:43 PM, Matej Kollar wrote:
%* standard allows closing of tags,
%
% Let me rephrase this: standard allows adding an optional trailing slash
% to void elements, that by definition do not have end tags, as syntax
% sugar[0].
%
% Non-void elements must
Silvio Moioli wrote:
% Is this your own personal opinion or the whole Spacewalk team official
% position? In particular, will future patches be rejected if they have
% those trailing slashes?
%
% Oops, typo there. I really meant:
%
% In particular, will future patches be rejected unless they
On 18/02/14 14:10, Michael Mraka wrote:
Using self-closed tags for void elements as well as using end tags even
in situations where they can be omitted in HTML5 is common agreement
among whole team. They improve readability - you immediately know what
was intentional and what a mistake.
As
