Dne 27.6.2012 21:44, Miroslav Suchy napsal(a):
I will make it short:
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=unstablesection=allarch=anysearchon=nameskeywords=rhn
Enjoy.
Mirek
Mirku,
Sounds good. We are going to test.
David Hrbáč
___
You'll need to make the EPEL and Space walk channels child channels in both
of the CentOS 6 and 6.2 channels. Yes, its a pain. No, a child can only
have a single parent.
CC
On Jun 28, 2012 8:53 AM, Gregory Machin g...@linuxpro.co.za wrote:
Hi.
I have setup a dedicated channel for the CentOS
Hello,
Did you have time to review the patch?
Now that I got patch working, I wanted to try patch_cluster and
ZipFile class is complaining!
# solaris2mpm --tempdir=/data/solaris/tmp/ 10_Recommended.zip
Opening archive, this may take a while
Bad magic number for central directory
Error
I've ran unzip command on 10_recommended.zip and here is the message I
get at the beggining:
# unzip -d tmp/ -q 10_Recommended.zip
warning [10_Recommended.zip]: 76 extra bytes at beginning or within zipfile
(attempting to process anyway)
error [10_Recommended.zip]: reported length of central
Pierre Casenove wrote:
% Hello,
% Did you have time to review the patch?
%
% Now that I got patch working, I wanted to try patch_cluster and
% ZipFile class is complaining!
% # solaris2mpm --tempdir=/data/solaris/tmp/ 10_Recommended.zip
% Opening archive, this may take a while
% Bad magic
Hello,
Indeed, on RHEL 5:
rpm -qf /usr/bin/unzip
unzip-5.52-3.el5
on RHEL 6:
# rpm -qa | grep unzip
unzip-6.0-1.el6.x86_64
Problem is: unzip v6 is not available on RHEL 5... Is the conclusion
that solaris2mpm is not compatible with RHEL 5?
Pierre
2012/6/28 Michael Mraka
Pierre Casenove wrote:
% Hello,
% Please find attached a complementary patch to correct the remove patch query.
% Note that the first patch was already correcting part of the query
%
% Thanks,
%
% Pierre
Hi Pierre,
I've reviewed and commited both patches.
Thanks.
--
Michael Mráka
Satellite
Thanks a lot.
2012/6/28 Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com:
Pierre Casenove wrote:
% Hello,
% Please find attached a complementary patch to correct the remove patch
query.
% Note that the first patch was already correcting part of the query
%
% Thanks,
%
% Pierre
Hi Pierre,
I've
I'm in the early stages of setting up Spacewalk on a RHEL5 server. The
installation was started by someone else before 1.7 came out so they decided to
hold of on RHEL6. Most of the environment here is running RHEL5 and we only
have 1 or 2 test servers running RHEL6. I'm wondering how
Hi Robert,
I’m wondering how complicated it’s likely to be to upgrade the
server to RHEL6.
Upgrades from RHEL5 to 6 are not supported by RedHat, so if you care about
support (what I would suspect since you're paying for it) this is not an
option for you.
I would go for: install RHEL6 in
Robert,
Here is what I would do - It may seem like a lot, but you will have a lot of
flexibility with nothing but time and a bit of resource to use.
We are heavy vmware shop, but the same can be done in KVM/Xen or other
virtualization platforms.
This is how I hand all major upgrades - that no
Ilya and Jens,
I suppose my language wasn't clear in my request. I'm not upgrading from 1.6
to 1.7. I already installed 1.7 on RHEL5. I'm wanting to find out what the
process would be to upgrade the server from RHEL5 to RHEL6. So I think I can
take out the items related to upgrading
I'm looking for a way to replicate master spacewalk server from one IDC to
another - asynchronously.
My setup consists of RHEL5 and Spacewalk 1.7 with CNAME pointing to
spacewalk.domain.com - which in turn points to host in IDC1.
I was thinking of using slony to replicate postgres 8.4 and
It makes it easier, I personally would look to stand up a fresh RHEL6 instance
and install fresh spacewalk 1.7 and migrate spacewalk content (and other
components) over.
As Jens mentioned, there is no supported method of going from major RHEL5 to
RHEL6. It may work, but you will end up with a
well I have a different plan which I'm going to test in the next week or so
As far as i know satellite-sync should work between instances of
spacewalk so if i combine that with a squid 3 revers proxy (possibly
with an ssl bump configured ) or an LVS based load balancer and
finally add in a few
15 matches
Mail list logo
