Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.4 hanging after denied

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi Sam, On 07.10.2008 21:22 Uhr, Sam Clippinger wrote: > I've considered that option in the past and just never gotten around to > it. My reason for hesitating is that spamdyke should not disconnect too > soon -- it should continue running long enough to gather information for > its log messag

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
On 07.10.2008 20:41 Uhr, Arthur Girardi wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Making use of the opportunity, I'd like to suggest you changing line > 25 of your script where it reads: > > if( m/spamdyke/ ){ > > to > > if( m/spamdyke\[/ ){ > > so it only use spamdike processes' lines, becau

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke MAV support proposal

2008-10-07 Thread Arthur Girardi
In my own experience with hacked accounts, when a spammer breaks into a legitimate account, he usually try sending messages at once, in big volumes, which is then easily spotted. I have myself a little dirty crontab script which send me a message when the queue grows larger than what I cons

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.4 hanging after denied

2008-10-07 Thread Sam Clippinger
I've considered that option in the past and just never gotten around to it. My reason for hesitating is that spamdyke should not disconnect too soon -- it should continue running long enough to gather information for its log messages. In this particular case, disconnecting immediately would f

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke MAV support proposal

2008-10-07 Thread Sam Clippinger
I hadn't considered malicious authenticated users. In that case, a filter like this would prevent them from forging addresses of other users on your server. I don't believe that it would stop spam from remote attackers who guess/steal legitimate passwords however, because they would still kno

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-10-07 Thread Sergio Minini (NETKEY)
Thanks Felix, I figured it out: mcedit messed the pasted text. The wrong line was this comment: #printf "%2.2f%%\t(unknown/illegal)\n", (($originsum{$key}-$tldsum)/$originsum{$key}*100) if $tldsum && ($originsum{$key}-$tldsum); Thanks again for the script. Sergio > -Original Message- > F

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

2008-10-07 Thread Arthur Girardi
Hi Felix, Making use of the opportunity, I'd like to suggest you changing line 25 of your script where it reads: if( m/spamdyke/ ){ to if( m/spamdyke\[/ ){ so it only use spamdike processes' lines, because if not it will also catch qmail log lines, for example, messages f

Re: [spamdyke-users] /etc/tcp.smtp

2008-10-07 Thread Sam Clippinger
This behavior is correct. Incoming SMTP connections are accepted by tcpserver, which reads the /etc/tcp.smtp(.cdb) file and sets the environment variable "RELAYCLIENT" for all connections. Because that variable is set, spamdyke allows the remote server to relay messages. -- Sam Clippinger Da

Re: [spamdyke-users] RNDS_MISSING - only it isn't

2008-10-07 Thread Faris Raouf
Thanks Felix. Yes, that was definitely the problem. Local DNS returns NXDOMAIN for the IPs in question using host. I'll remove it. Faris. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix Buenemann Sent: 07 October 2008 14:59 To: spamdyke-users@spamd

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.4 hanging after denied

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi, On 06.10.2008 16:26 Uhr, Sam Clippinger wrote: > The problem is that remote servers (spambots) are not disconnecting > after getting a rejection message. When spamdyke sends a rejection code > and there's no chance the connection could be allowed (e.g. no > whitelists remain to be matched)

Re: [spamdyke-users] make fails on FBSD

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
Or simply compile on a similar FreeBSD system e.g. a Desktop with gcc-4 and copy over the binaries to the server. On 05.10.2008 19:02 Uhr, K. Shantanu wrote: > Hello, > I guess, I will use spamdyke 3.x, which compiles nicely on that server. > > Thanks, > Shantanu ___

Re: [spamdyke-users] RNDS_MISSING - only it isn't

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
Try disabling lookups to your local server (127.0.0.1) in resolv.conf - it might carry a reverse ip zone file (in-addr.arpa) for the network of your servers ip but does not list the reverse dns entries of the other servers. But as bind thinks it's authoritative for that zone it'll fail the dns requ

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke MAV support proposal

2008-10-07 Thread Felix Buenemann
Hi Sam, sorry for my late reply, I've been away for a few days. On 01.10.2008 0:35 Uhr, Sam Clippinger wrote: > I've seen systems like this before; Yahoo! uses something similar to > restrict authenticated email. In their system, authenticated users can > only send messages "from" the authenti

[spamdyke-users] /etc/tcp.smtp

2008-10-07 Thread Davide D'Amico
I am using spamdyke and I have a problem with access file. I use: dflybsd# more /etc/tcp.smtp :allow,RELAYCLIENT="" dflybsd# And: dflybsd# more /usr/local/vpopmail/tcp.smtp 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow This is my spamdyke.conf: dflybsd# more /usr/local/etc/spamdyke.conf log-level=exce