How would that apply in case of a pop3 before smtp?
On 17 November 2010 02:07, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 11/16/2010 02:37 PM, psotnic wrote:
Dear Sirs!
First of all I would like to thank You for Your time!
My question:
Is it possible to disable greylisting when
If you have Qmail-Toaster you have the solution.
2010/11/17 psotnic psot...@gmail.com
How would that apply in case of a pop3 before smtp?
On 17 November 2010 02:07, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 11/16/2010 02:37 PM, psotnic wrote:
Dear Sirs!
First of all I would like to
I'm not sure about that. I suppose that would depend on how you have
pb4s implemented. As long as spamdyke is configured to use an
authentication mechanism which supports pb4s (spamdyke is very flexible
with authentication), I don't expect there would be a problem.
Are you having a problem, or
Ever so true. Anyone using qmail who is not using Qmail-Toaster is
making things harder than they need to be. :)
However, the stock QMT configuration does not support pb4s. It could be
modified to do so, but pb4s is not a preferred authentication mechanism,
for good reasons.
On 11/17/2010
I don't accept donations for spamdyke, but you are welcome to contribute
to the project whenever you like. A translation of the documentation
would be terrific.
I would like to make spamdyke work with Exchange eventually, but that's
probably some distance in the future.
-- Sam Clippinger
On
spamdyke doesn't have the ability to reject empty senders, though it
wouldn't be too hard to add. I haven't added that filter because
blocking all empty senders will also block NDRs, since those are usually
delivered with empty sender addresses as well.
-- Sam Clippinger
On 11/14/10 5:02 PM,
Yes, you can do this using a configuration directory. The full
documentation is here:
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#CONFIGURATION_DIR
-- Sam Clippinger
On 11/16/10 3:37 PM, psotnic wrote:
Dear Sirs!
First of all I would like to thank You for Your time!
My
