Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke on submission port for access control

2012-05-02 Thread Sam Clippinger
That looks like it would work, but I've never tried patching and recompiling qmail on Plesk. I would expect wild variations on mileage. Also, a patched qmail would be replaced/broken the next time any Plesk updates are applied. -- Sam Clippinger On May 2, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Eric Shubert wr

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke on submission port for access control

2012-05-02 Thread Eric Shubert
Thanks for the insight, Sam. Perhaps eMPF is what Faris is looking for. (?) http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf-install (FWIW, eMPF is baked in with QMT) -- -Eric 'shubes' On 05/02/2012 09:29 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote: > So you have many users on your Plesk server, but you only want some of > them

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke on submission port for access control

2012-05-02 Thread Sam Clippinger
So you have many users on your Plesk server, but you only want some of them to be able to authenticate? I'm not sure I understand the purpose of that -- are you trying to limit the remaining users to only sending to recipients hosted on the same server? I've never heard of anyone wanting to re

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke on submission port for access control

2012-05-02 Thread Eric Shubert
On 05/02/2012 08:34 AM, Faris Raouf wrote: > One of the vital features missing from Plesk is the ability to control > who can use the hosting server’s authenticated smtp facilities. I must be missing something here. To begin with, I'm not familiar with Plesk (I use QMailToaster). It seems to me

[spamdyke-users] Spamdyke on submission port for access control

2012-05-02 Thread Faris Raouf
Dear all, I've been using spamdyke (in conjunction with qmail-scanner/sa/clamav) with various version of Plesk for years now. Thanks again to Sam for such a fantastic project. One of the vital features missing from Plesk is the ability to control who can use the hosting server's authenticat