Actually, very soon now. I'm very close to releasing a new version that
includes this fix and a bunch of others (but does not, sadly, include
recipient validation). I have two more small changes to make and test,
then I'll be ready to send out a beta version. I'd really like help
testing
Hartmut Wernisch wrote:
On 22 Mar 10, Mirko Buffoni wrote:
At 13.10 19/03/2010 +0100, you wrote:
At 13.39 19/03/2010 +1100, you wrote:
On 19/03/2010 07:15, t...@uncon.org wrote:
Started a new thread for this improved patch. This should fix the
SSL_accept, SSL_shutdown and SSL_read issues. It
-users-boun...@spamdyke.org [mailto:spamdyke-users-
mailto:spamdyke-users-
boun...@spamdyke.org mailto:boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of
Hartmut Wernisch
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:09 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung
www.norcalisp.com
-Original Message-
From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org [mailto:spamdyke-users-
boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Hartmut Wernisch
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:09 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung processes
On 22 Mar 10, Mirko
Message-
From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org [mailto:spamdyke-users-
boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Hartmut Wernisch
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:09 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung processes
On 22 Mar 10, Mirko Buffoni wrote
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Marlon Klee
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:01 PM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung processes
It's not a Flaw in Spamdyke, because the People that uses Qmail but not
Spamdyke
had the same kind of problems, you can check
At 13.10 19/03/2010 +0100, you wrote:
At 13.39 19/03/2010 +1100, you wrote:
On 19/03/2010 07:15, t...@uncon.org wrote:
Started a new thread for this improved patch. This should fix the
SSL_accept, SSL_shutdown and SSL_read issues. It temporarily sets the
socket to non-blocking and
