Re: [spamdyke-users] 100% CPU utilization and stuck spamdyke processes (4.2.0)

2011-08-27 Thread Chris Boulton
Just wanted to followup regarding this - Looks like there might be an issue with sender-blacklist-entry. We've got a single address blocked at the moment and I removed it from our configuration yesterday and we've not had any spamdyke processes get stuck since. I've looked at the code and

Re: [spamdyke-users] 100% CPU utilization and stuck spamdyke processes (4.2.0)

2011-08-19 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'd be very interested to know how this turns out. Two things bug me about this solution: no matter what the timeout is, spamdyke should just sit quietly and wait for more input (using select()); it shouldn't consume any CPU at all. Also, when the idle timeout is zero and spamdyke disconnects

Re: [spamdyke-users] 100% CPU utilization and stuck spamdyke processes (4.2.0)

2011-08-18 Thread Eric Shubert
Is it spamdyke that's using the CPU, or another process? clamav had a problem doing this sort of thing a couple versions back (0.95.x iirc). Other than that, I haven't heard of anything like this. I'd look at processes related to queuing (scanners?) and see if there's a problem in that area.

[spamdyke-users] 100% CPU utilization and stuck spamdyke processes (4.2.0)

2011-08-17 Thread Chris Boulton
We're seeing a lot of spamdyke processes on our servers getting stuck in some sort of state where they'll hang, and use 100% CPU until we kill -9 them. Anyone else seeing this with 4.2.0? From what it looks like, it occurs once spamdyke has done its job and Qmail has accepted the message.