Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:32 PM
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time
for changes
like
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BC
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:32 PM
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do that if it would
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time for changes like
this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible anyway. What
about changing the log message for other reasons too? For example,
ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_IP, ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_SENDER, etc.
Sam Clippinger wrote:
ALLOWED_GRAYLISTED could be useful if graylisting isn't active for all
domains.
I'd be useful if graylisting all domains too, to find out how many senders
did not retry (due to, most probably, being spammers).
Regards,
--
Daddy, what Formatting drive C: means?...
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:04:09PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
I've already made this change in version 4.0.0 -- it has a new flag to
allow spamdyke to create domain folders itself. It can't be automatic
because some sites need the ability to activate/deactivate graylisting
for
Interesting idea. I'll put that on my list for a future version.
-- Sam Clippinger
Andras Korn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:21:51AM +0200, Bgs wrote:
Add another dot to your me-too-list :)
Adding more info about which rule allowed or disallowed a specific mail
would help both in
] On Behalf Of
Marcin Orlowski
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:17 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
Michael Colvin wrote:
Doesn't it already log DENIED GREYLISTED when it greylists an
address, then when it is sent again, and passes the
greylist test
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marcin Orlowski
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:42 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
Yes, but, by definition, any e-mail that is ALLOWED
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I've already made this change in version 4.0.0 -- it has a new flag to
allow spamdyke to create domain folders itself. It can't be automatic
because some sites need the ability to activate/deactivate graylisting
for specific domains without affecting others.
what
I'm planning to add that in a future version but not in 4.0.0. The list
of changes for that version is already incredibly long and I've been
trying to finish testing it for the last month or two. I have no idea
how long the documentation updates are going to take.
Look for this in 4.1.0 or
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I'm planning to add that in a future version but not in 4.0.0. The list
of changes for that version is already incredibly long and I've been
trying to finish testing it for the last month or two. I have no idea
how long the documentation updates are going to take.
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time for changes like
this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible anyway. What
about changing the log message for other reasons too? For example,
ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_IP, ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_SENDER, etc.
-- Sam Clippinger
Marcin
I think this would be very useful!
Please do so.
Regards
Arne
Sam Clippinger schrieb:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time for changes like
this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible anyway. What
about changing the log message for other reasons too? For
@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time
for changes
like this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible
anyway.
What about changing the log message for other
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BC
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:32 PM
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do
Yes, it's very useful, I guess...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:50:38 -0500
Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time for changes like
this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible anyway. What
about changing the log message for other
: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could do that if it would be useful. Now is the time
for changes
like this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible
anyway.
What about changing the log
Hi,
For graylisting to work in current version the domain folders must be
created before graylisting will work. This is the most common mistake
when setting up spamdyke to perform graylisting. May I opt for a
feature to just make spamdyke graylist all the connections *without*
the need of the
Well what I did was create a shell script since i add all my new users
and domains at the command line on my toaster to set my default
quota's, etc.
I just added a line to create that directory.
Works like a charm and enables my gray listing from the get go.
dnk
On 22-Apr-08, at 11:31
dnk wrote:
I just added a line to create that directory.
Works like a charm and enables my gray listing from the get go.
If you want all traffic graylisted this is simply unnecesary. If
spamdyke can create user dir it could domain too. One item
less to manage and keep eye on.
Marcin
20 matches
Mail list logo
