I'll try the double-spamdyke trick to see if that works for me. Nice idea
:-)
Having thought about it, other than for logging purposes, I don't absolutely
100% need filters AFTER authentication. I just need filters before
authentication.
e.g. IF (no rdns | is in blacklist | fails any other normal
Thanks Lutz.
I'm sure that would work and I will definitely try it.
But I'd still not be able to do connection timeouts and rdns checks etc,
which ideally I'd like to do.
> May be it's simple: spamdyke sits in front of all and does
authentification in
> your case. Shouldn't it be possible to in
Sam,
Great idea. I've made a simple test and takes longer but it works.
I will put on a production server soon.
I'll wait for the next version, that include "recipient validation" will
help a lot.
Thanks
On 09/04/13 11:11, Sam Clippinger wrote:
> Interesting ideas. To make it possible to di
Interesting ideas. To make it possible to disable authentication from specific
locations, I suppose the easiest way would be to make the "smtp-auth-level"
option valid in a configuration directory. Then you could create directories
using the IP ranges or rDNS names of those countries and inclu
Sam,
I agree, it would be excellent if the filters can be enabled with SMTP-AUTH.
On 09/04/13 08:58, Faris Raouf wrote:
>> I have a doubt:
>> If a user authenticates with SMTP auth. All filters are ignored?
>> If true, Why?
>>
> All filters other than the reply delay (earlytalker filter) are, as
> But I was going to post about this too. I also would love the *option* to
> enable filters even if there's authentication.
May be it's simple: spamdyke sits in front of all and does authentification
in your case. Shouldn't it be possible to insert the classic rblsmtpd between
spamdyke and den s
> I have a doubt:
> If a user authenticates with SMTP auth. All filters are ignored?
> If true, Why?
>
All filters other than the reply delay (earlytalker filter) are, as far as
I'm aware, disabled when smtp authentication happens.
But I was going to post about this too. I also would love the *o
On 04/08/2013 01:40 PM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
>
>> What sort of restriction(s) would you like to see for authenticated
>> submissions? You might look into eMPF for these types of needs (policy
>> restrictions).
>
> Really simpel: To be safe we in general don't allow clients to access if
> the ip i
> What sort of restriction(s) would you like to see for authenticated
> submissions? You might look into eMPF for these types of needs (policy
> restrictions).
Really simpel: To be safe we in general don't allow clients to access if
the ip is listed at spamhaus sbl-xbl. This had good effects.
On 04/08/2013 01:04 PM, Jorge R Constenla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a doubt:
> If a user authenticates with SMTP auth. All filters are ignored?
Yes.
> If true, Why?
Why not?
Many users submit from dynamic address locations, which are typically
blacklisted. If filters weren't bypassed, they wou
Hi,
I have a doubt:
If a user authenticates with SMTP auth. All filters are ignored?
If true, Why?
Thanks in advance.
--
Jorge R. Constenla
j...@rednetgroup.com
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailm
11 matches
Mail list logo
