Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Michael Colvin
/ _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paulo Henrique Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:18 PM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem I had a problem like this and decided putting the timeout from qmail less than the timeout from spamdyke, see

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Bruce Schreiber
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paulo Henrique Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:18 PM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem I had a problem like this and decided putting the timeout from qmail less than

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Michael Colvin
, April 28, 2008 7:59 AM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem The issue where timed-out messages are delivered anyway will be fixed in version 4.0.0. I don't see how ClamAV could be causing Eric's timeouts but again, since I don't (yet) understand what's

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Eric Shubert
I was wrong - I *do* have idle-timeout-secs specified as 60. I'll go ahead and bump it up just above my timoutsmtpd value, and we'll see what happens. Sam Clippinger wrote: I would be very interested to know if that solves your problem, Eric. I can't see why it would, but since I don't (yet)

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Eric Shubert
://www.norcalisp.com/ *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Paulo Henrique *Sent:* Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:18 PM *To:* spamdyke users *Subject:* Re: [spamdyke-users

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Michael Colvin
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:39 AM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem Michael, Do you have spamassassin's bayes_auto_expire turned on? This can take

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-28 Thread Bgs
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:39 AM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem Michael, Do you have spamassassin's bayes_auto_expire turned on? This can take long enough that the sending server times out when autoexpire kicks in. To get around this, I turn off

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-27 Thread Paulo Henrique
I had a problem like this and decided putting the timeout from qmail less than the timeout from spamdyke, see: cat /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd 240 grep idle-timeout-secs /var/qmail/control/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf idle-timeout-secs = 300 After that never had problem with the repetition of

Re: [spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-27 Thread Eric Shubert
That's interesting, Paulo. I have timeoutsmtpd at 600, and nothing specified for idle-timeout-secs. Sam's having a look at a couple of my logs. I'll be glad to try this out if Sam gives me the word (I don't want to mess up his debugging efforts). I wonder if idle-timeout-secs is somehow not being

[spamdyke-users] Timeout problem

2008-04-22 Thread Eric Shubert
I had a problem receiving a particular email message. It would always send the same amount of data, then timeout. The same amount of data was sent/received with timeouts of 60 and 180 seconds. I logged the message (great little feature of spamdyke btw), and the end part of the message log always