[spamdyke-users] Performance uber alles

2008-02-08 Thread BC
On 2/8/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One important thought: have you tried installing a caching name server on your mail server? That's usually the single biggest thing you can do to improve performance. .. and it is EASY to do. Heed this advice! Bucky

[spamdyke-users] The Rational Approach

2008-02-08 Thread BC
On 2/8/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally disagree with DJB's position about strictly interpreting the RFCs -- I believe software should strictly follow RFCs when producing output and loosely follow them when accepting it. This is a highly rational approach. DJB ought to look

Re: [spamdyke-users] The Rational Approach

2008-02-08 Thread BC
On 2/8/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally disagree with DJB's position about strictly interpreting the RFCs -- I believe software should strictly follow RFCs when producing output and loosely follow them when accepting it. This is a highly rational

Re: [spamdyke-users] Caching nameservers?

2008-02-08 Thread Sam Clippinger
Yes. If your server uses 127.0.0.1 as its primary name server, you have (at least) a caching name server installed. It can also do other things, such as hosting domains, but what's important is that spamdyke's queries don't have to travel across the network. -- Sam Clippinger BC wrote: On