[spamdyke-users] Feature request

2008-04-14 Thread Paolo
Hello, I really think mail servers shoud reject connections from IP without rdns, I was tryng to impose it to my customers but I think I must desist for too much good mail being rejected. I't could be useful to have a per domain reject-empty-rdns, to gradually implement this feature. Just

Re: [spamdyke-users] Feature request

2008-04-14 Thread Paolo
Hi, sorry I was not clear. I mean to enable reject-empty-rdns only for some recipients domains . Thank you Ciao Paolo Il giorno 14 apr 2008, alle ore 10:30, Andras Korn ha scritto: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Paolo wrote: I really think mail servers shoud reject connections

Re: [spamdyke-users] Feature request

2008-04-14 Thread Sam Clippinger
The next version of spamdyke already includes this feature. -- Sam Clippinger Paolo wrote: Hi, sorry I was not clear. I mean to enable reject-empty-rdns only for some recipients domains . Thank you Ciao Paolo Il giorno 14 apr 2008, alle ore 10:30, Andras Korn ha scritto: On

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Sam Clippinger
Andras Korn wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only reject recipients for relaying. They shouldn't, as stock qmail is liable to causing backscatter. No self-respecting admin should run

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Sam Clippinger
Yes, this is certainly possible. Right now spamdyke identifies the RBL in its message to the remote server but not in the logs. Good idea! What would be a good way to log this information (preferably without breaking existing scripts)? I'm thinking as I type here, but spamdyke already

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Andras Korn
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:40:51AM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Andras Korn wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only reject recipients for relaying. They shouldn't, as stock qmail is

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Michael Colvin
Great! Of course, this feature could also be used to determine if a specific RBL is causing to many false-positives too... Running all the checks simultaneously certainly will negate the need to order them in any specific order and should make the overall process that much faster, especially if

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Sam Clippinger
The aggressive DNS queries will definitely increase the momentary load on the DNS servers, because they will get a burst of simultaneous queries each time a remote server connects. However, the overall load won't go up because the long-term rate of DNS queries is determined by the rate of

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

2008-04-14 Thread Eric Shubert
I like having specific RBLs logged. I just installed spamdyke on a few qmail-toasters yesterday (replacing rblsmtpd), and was going to as about this. Michael beat me to it! ;) If simultaneous queries are being done, can all RBLs that match be logged? Perhaps a comma separated list within