Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
If that explanation doesn't fit, could you send more details about the
connections that aren't delayed? A full log would be perfect.
-
Yes Sam, it's a reasonable explanation, as is reasonable that i'm a dumb :)
Thx again,
Davide
Hello everybody,
I hope this is not a FAQ , I'd like to know if there is some reason
to prefer rbl to rhsbl .
Wouldn't it be nice to write down a list of options with explained
how much is the risk of rejecting good mail ?
for example in my configuration I've not enabled these options
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:09:34 +0600
N.Novozhilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just increase idle-timeout-secs=180 , seems it help (as palliative).
... but not at all
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:37:52 +0600
N.Novozhilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From yesterday I discover very strange
I'm not sure I understand the problem or the strace output. You're
seeing a single spamdyke process remain running and never exit? I need
more information before I can help. Are you using the latest version of
spamdyke? How much CPU is it using? Are you seeing any errors in your
log