Re: [spamdyke-users] greeting-delay-check does not work properly ?

2008-01-25 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: If that explanation doesn't fit, could you send more details about the connections that aren't delayed? A full log would be perfect. - Yes Sam, it's a reasonable explanation, as is reasonable that i'm a dumb :) Thx again, Davide

[spamdyke-users] dns rbl or rhsbl checks

2008-01-25 Thread Paolo
Hello everybody, I hope this is not a FAQ , I'd like to know if there is some reason to prefer rbl to rhsbl . Wouldn't it be nice to write down a list of options with explained how much is the risk of rejecting good mail ? for example in my configuration I've not enabled these options

Re: [spamdyke-users] Strange situation - please help!

2008-01-25 Thread N.Novozhilov
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:09:34 +0600 N.Novozhilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just increase idle-timeout-secs=180 , seems it help (as palliative). ... but not at all On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:37:52 +0600 N.Novozhilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From yesterday I discover very strange

Re: [spamdyke-users] Strange situation - please help!

2008-01-25 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'm not sure I understand the problem or the strace output. You're seeing a single spamdyke process remain running and never exit? I need more information before I can help. Are you using the latest version of spamdyke? How much CPU is it using? Are you seeing any errors in your log