Re: [spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-07-13 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REPLY-TO But.. Return-Path: Message-ID: Received: List-* Are allowed ? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org

[spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-08-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REPLY-TO But.. Return-Path: Message-ID: Received: List-* Are allowed ? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-08-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
ut it just depends what the incoming spam looks like. -- Sam Clippinger On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote: Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REP

[spamdyke-users] reject-sender - Looking for a new feature

2017-05-09 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm looking for an option where the user login with u...@domain.com and write emails with u...@domain.com.ar , this is beacuse we have many domains with aliases (Vpopmail aliases) The reject-sender=not-local solve part of the problem, but not all Is there a chance to have a new option

Re: [spamdyke-users] reject-sender - Looking for a new feature

2017-05-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
it doesn't read qmail's "assign" file at all. In the long term, the best way to add something like this would probably be to allow spamdyke to run custom commands/scripts that perform additional checks. That would make it much easier to add one-off filters. -- Sam Clippinger On May

[spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content

2017-05-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm testing some things and I found that Rejecting Messages by Header Content is not working as I expected I have spamdyke 5.0.1 with header-blacklist-file=/spamdb/blacklist_header I'm trying to filter all mails from goldswatches.com, and I have this lines in the file

Re: [spamdyke-users] Question about headers

2017-08-24 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Thanks Sam I thought the same, surely lines 3 to 6 are just to "mislead" Thanks again - Original Message - From: "Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users" To: "spamdyke users" Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:35 AM Subject: Re:

[spamdyke-users] How to filter Invalid FROM ?

2018-09-26 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I know the option reject-sender, but I trying to stop mails on a MX server when the FROM header has an invalid value like : servic...@socelec.com.armhs...@loskop.co.za or only a name like "Nielsen" I know the difference beteween the FROM header and the real FROM (return-path), but may be

[spamdyke-users] Is there a way to filter mails from locals domains coming from "the internet" ?

2019-11-12 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Is there a way to filter mails from locals domains coming from "the internet" ? Weird question : D It's something like a SPF filter I want to block all mails comeing from public IP from domains I have in my server Thanks Pablo Murillo

[spamdyke-users] ERROR (nihdns_query()@dns.c): unable to send data packet....

2020-10-14 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi ERROR(nihdns_query()@dns.c:931): unable to send data packet, tried to send 44 bytes: No buffer space available or ERROR(nihdns_query()@dns.c:962): unable to send data packet, tried to send 44 bytes: No buffer space available Today I started seeing this error in my server Any idea ? The

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
to compile whit tls, the result is the same compiling without tls support Thanks, but, the idea is to compile with TLS On 10/23/2020 9:42 AM, Amitai Schleier via spamdyke-users wrote: On 22 Oct 2020, at 22:10, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: I'm upgrading few server from

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: I applied your patches on the source files, compile with TLS support, and the program was compiled, yes, but, without TLS support I checked the patches before compile and I saw that the only thing you did (about TLS) was to remove all the lines whe

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
be a case of libcrypto.so being in an unexpected folder; it's possible just adding the -L flag or setting LIBRARY_PATH might fix it. -- Sam Clippinger On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users <mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>> wrote: Hi I'm upgr

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Thanks, but not, I use FreeBSD, not netBSD I prefer to work with sources I downloaded the tar.gz from spamdyke and compile in the old fashion way I like to see what I'm doing :D On 10/23/2020 5:58 PM, Amitai Schleier via spamdyke-users wrote: On 23 Oct 2020, at 21:50, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
I'm using now without TLS but I have to move around 50 servers from 11.3 to 12.1 !, anda I need to have TLS because allmost everyone are using smtp with tls, and going back to no-tls will be a big problem On 10/22/2020 5:33 PM, Dirk Kannapinn via spamdyke-users wrote: Had the same issue after

[spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm upgrading few server from FreeBSD 11.4 to 12.1 and I found that the port fot SpamDyke is broken, so I compile "manually" and I found a problem with OpenSSL Spamdyke is not finding openssl, and openssl is installed ./configure --enable-tls --without-debug-output checking for gcc... gcc

[spamdyke-users] Not all traffic logged to maillog

2022-04-08 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I have 4 servers (MXs) configured with spamdyke and I noticed yesterday, that not all the traffic is logged I noticed that because I have the log for the receptors and I can see the traffic loged in qmail send log from the mx, but I didn't find the info in maillog Only 1 server is