Probably not, at least not in the next version. spamdyke's DNS system
sends its queries simultaneously and accepts the first positive response
it receives. The rest are discarded. In order to log them all,
spamdyke would have to wait for all responses to come back, which would
slow down the
Andras Korn wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only
reject recipients for relaying.
They shouldn't, as stock qmail is liable to causing backscatter. No
self-respecting admin should run
Yes, this is certainly possible. Right now spamdyke identifies the RBL
in its message to the remote server but not in the logs. Good idea!
What would be a good way to log this information (preferably without
breaking existing scripts)? I'm thinking as I type here, but spamdyke
already
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:40:51AM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
Andras Korn wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only
reject recipients for relaying.
They shouldn't, as stock qmail is
faster handling of the
session?
Thanks again!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
Clippinger
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:40 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts
, 2008 9:40 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts
a recipient before doing RHSBL?
Yes, this is certainly possible. Right now spamdyke
identifies the RBL in its message to the remote server but
not in the logs. Good idea!
What would be a good way
I like having specific RBLs logged. I just installed spamdyke on a few
qmail-toasters yesterday (replacing rblsmtpd), and was going to as about
this. Michael beat me to it! ;)
If simultaneous queries are being done, can all RBLs that match be logged?
Perhaps a comma separated list within
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
Andras Korn wrote:
I don't agree. These days, there are RBLs that will automatically list and
delist IPs in the space of a few hours, well within the lifetime of a single
email message.
If a server is being added and
The RHSBL filter checks rDNS names and sender addresses, not recipient
addresses. It also produces permanent rejection codes, not temporary
ones. If you're seeing the same sender rejected repeatedly, it's
because the remote server is sending repeatedly.
Also, spamdyke should be disconnecting
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 06:10:04PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote:
The RHSBL filter checks rDNS names and sender addresses, not recipient
addresses.
I know.
It also produces permanent rejection codes, not temporary ones.
OK, with RHSBL, that is probably justified. However, I hope RBL by
10 matches
Mail list logo
