Re: [spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-20 Thread Eric Shubert
If you're using qmailtoaster, you can submit to port 587, which always authenticates, and I believe does not invoke spamassassin. I'm not 100% positive about this though. nightduke wrote: Yes that's my idea whitelist anyone that authenticates to my qmail server and bypass spamassassin...

[spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-19 Thread nightduke
Hi i wish to know if can be done bypass spamdyke if spamdyke accepts smtp auth connection? I would like to trust on customer who sign on correctly at smtp and then starts the delivery... It's possible to do that? Thanks Nightduke ___ spamdyke-users

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-19 Thread David Stiller
Spamdyke already does that on my system, like this: Aug 19 14:18:59 plesk-mail spamdyke[29178]: ALLOWED from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 84.132.147.168 origin_rdns: ***.dip0.t-ipconnect.de auth: w.viertel Or do you mean, you

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamassassin and spamdyke

2008-08-19 Thread nightduke
Yes that's my idea whitelist anyone that authenticates to my qmail server and bypass spamassassin... It's possible? Thanks Nightduke 2008/8/19 David Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oh, sorry... missed the subject ;) I don't scan outgoing mails with spamassassin^^ nightduke schrieb: Hi i wish