Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE Question

2015-03-24 Thread Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
The error DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE means spamdyke found an rDNS name, but the name it found doesn't forward-resolve to an IP address (any IP address). So even though compxroads.com has an IP, m1.compxroads.com does not, so spamdyke rejected it. -- Sam Clippinger On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Den

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE

2015-02-08 Thread Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE is produced by the "reject-unresolvable-rdns" filter. If you disable that option in your configuration file, that filter will stop blocking connections. http://spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#RDNS Enabling or disabling filters for specific servers, senders or

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread info
Great, so if spamdyke could not resolve ip, triger a 'try again later..' ? perfect. Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito: > Actually, DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE means that spamdyke found a reverse DNS > name, but that name doesn't resolve to an IP address. However, because > this error can

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread Sam Clippinger
Actually, DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE means that spamdyke found a reverse DNS name, but that name doesn't resolve to an IP address. However, because this error can be triggered by temporary DNS problems (slow/unreachable/down servers), spamdyke always issues a "temporary" rejection code in this situat

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread info
thanks folks :D Arthur Girardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito: > Not likely, since in the first error spamdyke did get a non-existant reply. > > To me it looks like hotmail just put yet another new server up, and > configured the reverse for it a little too late. > > Arthur > > Citando [EMAIL PRO

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread Arthur Girardi
Not likely, since in the first error spamdyke did get a non-existant reply. To me it looks like hotmail just put yet another new server up, and configured the reverse for it a little too late. Arthur Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Then... this must be caused for a timeout trying to resolve ? >

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
Looks like a temporarily problem, the RDNS can be found now: # host -r 65.55.111.96 96.111.55.65.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer blu0-omc2-s21.blu0.hotmail.com. David Stiller schrieb: > I think spamdyke doesn't find the origin_ip listed in the mx's of > hotmail.com: > > # dig mx hotmail.com

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
Yes could be a case, or the reverse DNS entry was not created at that moment by dynamically created outbound mail servers. Your server could not look up the rdns of the IP at Nov 10 09:32:33, so it was yesterday. It can be a nameserver refreshing issue, updating DNS entries 24hrs. Normally pointer

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread info
Then... this must be caused for a timeout trying to resolve ? David Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito: > Looks like a temporarily problem, the RDNS can be found now: > > # host -r 65.55.111.96 > 96.111.55.65.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer > blu0-omc2-s21.blu0.hotmail.com. > > > David Stil

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread info
Yes but, isn't needed to be listed as mx. Is a outbound mail server, not an mx. And, error must be related MX nor RDNS issue. isn't it ? David Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrito: > I think spamdyke doesn't find the origin_ip listed in the mx's of > hotmail.com: > > # dig mx hotmail.com | g

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE another issue

2008-11-11 Thread David Stiller
I think spamdyke doesn't find the origin_ip listed in the mx's of hotmail.com: # dig mx hotmail.com | grep "65.55.111.96" # host -r 65.55.111.96 96.111.55.65.in-addr.arpa has no PTR record [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi > > > spamdyke is blocking emails like this: > > Nov 10 09:32:33 mail spam

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-29 Thread Sam Clippinger
Using your configuration file, spamdyke is running two rDNS tests on incoming connections. First, it checks if the remote host has an rDNS name at all. If it does not, spamdyke will log DENIED_RDNS_MISSING. Then, it checks if the rDNS name resolves to an IP address. If it does not, spamdyke

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-29 Thread David Stiller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi > > > >> David >> > I had use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example of mail, is not real mail. > Yes, thats why i didn't use a dig on that and said "i guess". > >> Peter >> > I check same too, 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net don't resolve to A > entry. But

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-28 Thread David Stiller
I guess 92.112.255.53 is not listed as a valid MX for mail.com in the "from:"-field? [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi guys. > > > I'm fascianted with spamdyke, but i found issues like this > > Oct 28 13:15:11 myshost spamdyke[28940]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE with reverse dns

2008-10-28 Thread pe...@peter.nameservice.mobi
Hi! I think it means that the R-DNS is not resolveable: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net ping: unknown host 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +trace 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net ; <<>> DiG 9.5.0-P2 <<>> +trace 53-255-112-92.pool.ukrtel.net ;; global op