--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Michiel van der Blonk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe, I did better than this
Statistics for 36 games
These short runs aren't really convincing. (You would often get
similar results by using the random number generator on your pocket
calculator
Embedded tiles could be cool.
Take a look at the 2 pictures I uploaded:
http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/lst?.dir=/
Gilles
My drawings are not accurate, real corner pieces are more
complicated,
it's just for the idea. The size and thickness of tiles should be
No.. It's the same name down here.
This is totally my fault. Shame on me !!!
I spell it wrong all the time. That's just one of many flaws my brain has.
I'm gonna beat myself numb with my cubes as soon as I finish this
email, they deserve the revenge.
Ohhh... the shame, the shame !!!
Marco the
I was looking at the WR history page and saw that the first WR for
Rubik's clock was set in India 1996!!! I was a little surprised so I
looked at the competition page but there were no Indian competition
listed under past events. Does anyone know anything about this result
and under which
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Marco Garbelini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS.: I fixed it.
PPS.: I'm sorry I made Bob cry.
PPPS.: I'm actually Brazilian, just living here for a while.
Haha. :-) Where is here?
~ Bob
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Pochmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But man, it has an S-turn !!!
Don't you know that S stands for sin ???
I thought S stands for spectacular, superb, and super-easy! ;)
~ Bob
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Hi!
I have always endorsed the idea about fused tiles. The tiles
themselves do not necessarily have to be very thick. Slightly
thincker than the ones found on the impossiball will be enough. On
those tiles only a very small pin is enough to fix them firmly to
the puzzle pieces (discs).
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Gunnar Krig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at the WR history page and saw that the first WR for
Rubik's clock was set in India 1996!!! I was a little surprised so I
looked at the competition page but there were no Indian competition
Well, I use the same algs Stefan posted...and I like them very much. Oh, and
for me S is...well...something like...strange...: - )
Pedro
Bob Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Pochmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But man, it has an
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, cmhardw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wish I had a camera and I could show you. I've gotten it in 1.5x
seconds several times though, so I mean it can be quite fast.
Hey, the other one is fast, too, I just did it 12 times in a row in
16.97 seconds,
- You can see the color only when facing the side (that's a problem
with thick tiles).
and why is that a problem? I'd much prefer tiles that stick out than
ones that sit flush
--Chris
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Chris Parlette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy crap! I just got a personal best of 19.86, which is my first
ever sub-20 solve! Thats about 2.5 seconds faster than my previous
personal best. It was also a part of my new best average of 28.13,
Count me in as well ;-)
Chris
I wish I could drop out of school and just cube all day.
Me too.
~ Bob
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
Oh, and congrats!!
-Chris
On 11/17/05, Chris Parlette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy crap! I just got a personal best of 19.86, which is my first
ever sub-20 solve! Thats about 2.5 seconds faster than my previous
personal best. It was also a part of my new best average of 28.13,
which is
If all of us fanatic cubers had cubing as a job, I wonder what average
times we would be able to achieve!? There would possibly be a lot of
ZB-solvers that also mastered multislotting and the ability to always
start with at least an xcross. (Am I dreaming??)
/Gunnar
--- In
I was doing me dayly cube traning when I got a non-lucky 14.60, which
is a very great time for me. Since it was non-lucky I thought I should
try to solve the same scramble again a few times and see what times my
skills could give me with a solve without ANY hesitation and stops. It
didn't take
Hi Chris,
I don't know if you're interested in seeing how someone might find
that on his or her own, but I thought Id tell you anyway. :)
A long time a go I was looking for a new way to reverse the position
of LL corners. Previously I had worked out R U R' U' which affects 4
corners and 3 edges
The exchangeable tiles are what I'd hoped the Mefferts cubes would be.
Instead they were glued on, except for the centers. And the
turning...ugh.
Since I'm obsessed with color schemes, I think it would be awesome if
they made one with swappable tiles in about 20 different colors.
*drool*
thats awesome!
the same thing occurred to me. ive been cubing for about 3 years
(though not very regularly) and i just started getting sub-20 times in
the summer. congrats!
On 11/17/05, Jason Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That happened to me with my one handed solving. My best one handed
My solution was also 50 moves. Maybe we did the same solve?
I made an extended cross, got the 6 move B orientation, and a G
permutation. Is this what your solve was like?
-Jason
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, Gunnar Krig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was doing me dayly cube
20 matches
Mail list logo
