> On Tuesday 24 July 2007, David Brownell wrote:
>> I want to be sure I understand this correctly. You're saying that
>> the call to spi_setup() inside of spi_new_device() failed silently?
No, I did not make myself clear.
I was talking about this code in spi_imx.c:
/* SPI datarate */
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> I want to be sure I understand this correctly. You're saying that
> the call to spi_setup() inside of spi_new_device() failed silently?
> And thus the scan_boardinfo() failed?
>
> If so, I'm thinking the following patch would help ... right?
Helps
On Monday 23 July 2007, llandre wrote:
> The probe function is not invoked because the controller does not allow
> to reach the max_speed_hz.
> I did not realize this before because, even if the debug messages were
> enabled, I did not see any warning message about this.
I want to be sure I unde
The probe function is not invoked because the controller does not allow
to reach the max_speed_hz.
I did not realize this before because, even if the debug messages were
enabled, I did not see any warning message about this.
--
llandre
DAVE Electronics System House - R&D Department
web: http
Hi all,
I'm working with kernel 2.6.21.3 on Freescale iMXL-based platform.
I have to write a SPI protocol driver for Quantum QT510 touch controller.
As starting point for board-init code I used the driver released by
Pavel Pisa:
http://rtime.felk.cvut.cz/repos/ppisa-linux-devel/kernel-patches/cur
