On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:00 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Hi everyone. I've been following spice development casually, hopefully as
a technology we can use for a big virtualization project in the next year or
so.
I notice that Spice is included in the RHEL 6 beta, which is very cool --
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:28:14AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
We're currently working heavily on getting spice into fedora. We've now
dropped all the problematic dependencies (ffmpeg, forked cairo, etc)
so we're in a much better state for his.
Good to hear -- thanks.
Hi,
Getting upstream qemu to have the patches sounds important regardless, but
I'm unclear on the first part of what you say here. Wouldn't any libraries
needed for spice by definition be used by an application?
That application would be qemu ...
This work is led by Gerd Hoffmann and can
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
I think it'd probably be productive to have the existing (or a new) yum
repository for fedora ready to go. It could hold the patched qemu, plus
RPMs of nightly snapshots of the source. Does that make sense? It's
something I could
On 4/22/2010 4:07 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Has anyone looked at making the spice clients use Kerberos/GSSAPI for
authentication? Since F11, Fedora has had this for VNC:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VirtVNCAuth
and it'd be a shame to not have the equivalent in Spice. This seems very
