Which client should one use? I'm a little confused reading the
documentation version looking at the download page.
http://spice-space.org/page/DeveloperStartPage says, client - this is
the old spice client. It is still supported but is being phased out in
favor of a new widgetized gtk/glib based
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:25:01PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Which client should one use? I'm a little confused reading the
documentation version looking at the download page.
http://spice-space.org/page/DeveloperStartPage says, client - this is
the old spice client. It is still
On Jul 4, 2011 6:25 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
However, spicec looks like it is in 0.8.1 whereas the download page says
gtk is experimental and provides a link with the latest versio being 0.6
from April. Thanks - John
Hi,
I believe that spice-gtk follows
Then I recommend that we create a library/framework/API so that
companies can use spice much easier programmatically.
Spice-Gtk has a complete API. It allows to create complete clients
without GTK using spice-client-glib.
This is basically a good approach I think - also to use the whole spice
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
This is basically a good approach I think - also to use the whole spice
client programmatically.
What I would like to see here would be a clean split between the
spice-client-glib (w/o the gtk parts) and spicy(the gtk parts) if
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:59:33PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
The question is if I could get a libspice-client-glib without gtk at all?
Ah, this should be doable, but you'd need to patch configure.ac and
gtk/Makefile.am for that, patches welcome :)
Christophe
pgplacMiE2Ta6.pgp
Description:
The slim barebone one :) Without all the gtk overhead...
I think if the audio-interface was more portable it would make a pretty
good starting point for porting.
On 4/29/11 11:05 AM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:56:11AM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
I
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:10:02AM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
The slim barebone one :) Without all the gtk overhead...
What overhead?
I think if the audio-interface was more portable it would make a pretty
good starting point for porting.
it? Something requiring X11 osx support isn't good
There are companies that only use spicec that don't want to make changes
right now.
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 10:54 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:57:50PM -0500, Cliff Sharp wrote:
I have spice-gtk built and running on OSX. It has some issues but it does
connect. I
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:49:14AM -0400, Cliff Sharp wrote:
There are companies that only use spicec that don't want to make changes
right now.
Not on OSX, do they? I'm really not understanding why using spice-gtk seems
to be so bad for you :(
Christophe
pgpByFrLpGmPB.pgp
Description: PGP
I never said that spice-gtk is bad for me.
There are companies that need and use spicec.
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 14:06 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:49:14AM -0400, Cliff Sharp wrote:
There are companies that only use spicec that don't want to make changes
right
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:22:12AM -0500, Cliff Sharp wrote:
I never said that spice-gtk is bad for me.
There are companies that need and use spicec.
Once again, why do they *need* it as opposed to they need a spice client,
they don't really care if it's C, python, raw X, Qt, ...
Saying these
Good question...
Here are some recommendations --
There are a number of companies that interface to spicec programmatically.
These companies right now do a fork exec or whatever to run spicec from within
their software products.
There are a number of reasons why they do not implement the spice
Hi,
- Original Message -
There are a number of companies that interface to spicec
programmatically.
These companies right now do a fork exec or whatever to run spicec
from within their software products.
There are a number of reasons why they do not implement the spice
protocol
This is great - thank you
On Apr 29, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
There are a number of companies that interface to spicec
programmatically.
These companies right now do a fork exec or whatever to run spicec
from within their software
15 matches
Mail list logo
