Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-14 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:52:19AM -0400, Alon Levy wrote: A second mistake, this was a result of -version-name and not libtool help being incorrect. So SONAME is indeed current-age. New question: is libspice-server.so.1.3.0 = 1.0.2 ? It should, even though we probably don't care ;)

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library supports t interfaces [current, current - age]. New libtool version is thus 3.0.3, since there are

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or equal to current, since it's

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
- Original Message - On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
- Original Message - - Original Message - On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or equal to current,