Bayer wrote:
On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Amir Elaguizy aela...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
If I have a model like:
class Test(Base):
value = sqlalchemy.Column(db.String)
and I have a function like:
def on_value_change(model, oldValue):
# Do stuff
I'd
If I have a model like:
class Test(Base):
value = sqlalchemy.Column(db.String)
and I have a function like:
def on_value_change(model, oldValue):
# Do stuff
I'd like on_value_change called *after* Test.value has been changed
I know it's possible to do it *before* Test.value has
Hey guys,
Questions about the following code in which I'm trying to take a textqual
query and join it to a query builder query.
1) What is the correct way to do the in for the list of ids in the first
query? My current way doesn't work and I'm not able to find a real good
example
2) How can I
I'm having this weird problem using the query caching recipes in which two
instances of a model representing the same underlying dataset will both get
into the session.
I know this is happening because I put all of the models in a set() and
there are two instances with the same underlying
?
Thanks!
Amir
On Friday, July 12, 2013 4:53:37 PM UTC-7, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Amir Elaguizy aela...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'd like a way to avoid the cost of repeatedly compiling the same query,
especially in the context of relationship caching
I'd like a way to avoid the cost of repeatedly compiling the same query,
especially in the context of relationship caching.
Specifically now that I have object caching in place, I have created my own
keys where it is possible. However there are still some cases where I
cannot. In these cases
If I do a query like this:
return PcpPostModel.query.filter_by(id=post_id).options(
FromCache(default)
)
and then later I do another query like this:
PcpPostModel.query.options(FromCache(default)).all()
Any models that were returned by the first query are
I noticed that between runs my cache hit rate using dogpile query caching
could change without any of the underlying data structures changing, after
digging in what I found was the join order on my polymorphic classes is not
deterministic. Is there any way to ensure a deterministic join order
, at 11:43 AM, Amir Elaguizy aela...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
If I do a query like this:
return PcpPostModel.query.filter_by(id=post_id).options(
FromCache(default)
)
and then later I do another query like
))
return util.WeakSequence(descendants)
def polymorphic_iterator(self):
On Jul 11, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Amir Elaguizy aela...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I noticed that between runs my cache hit rate using dogpile query caching
could change without any of the underlying data
I'd need to come up with a test.
On Jul 11, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Amir Elaguizy aela...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Michael,
That works!
Amir
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:17:27 AM UTC-7, Michael Bayer wrote:
when you say between runs, you mean whole new processes with new
mappers
pay fairly well.
We really need someone who is available immediately. If interested please
e-mail me: a...@toutpost.com
Thanks!
Amir Elaguizy
Founder of Toutpost
a...@toutpost.com
*Technical overview of the issue:*
We're paying massive costs in CPU time building the models, even though our
, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Amir Elaguizy aelag...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi there,
I have a tree that looks like this, reflected via polymorphic
inheritance:
what do we mean reflected here, are you reflecting tables from the
database, that is,
http
on this particular issue.
On Monday, June 3, 2013 10:55:15 PM UTC-7, Amir Elaguizy wrote:
Hi there,
I have a tree that looks like this, reflected via polymorphic inheritance:
A
/ | \
B C D
That works great, like:
class BaseModel(db.Model): # Table A in diagram
14 matches
Mail list logo
