In Oracle, I would like to perform a correlated subquery where
multiple columns are specified in the set clause and those columns are
selected by the subquery. For example:
UPDATE table1 a
SET (a.column1, a.column2) = (SELECT b.column1, b.column2 FROM table2
b WHERE a.id=b.id)
WHERE
the underlying schema defines no primary key. That part seemed
fine, but I then had to work with relations on those tables that I was
mapping explicitly and I found it easier at that point just to skip
SqlSoup and define the table metadata and mapping myself.
I hope that helps.
Stephen Emslie
reflecting tables directly with sqlalchemy, using Table(name,
meta, autoload=True), one can override the reflected columns to
compensate for the lack of a primary key. Is this possible in SqlSoup?
Stephen Emslie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
You could try changing your _limit tuple to a property on the class
that returns the tuple you want.
For example:
class Result(object):
def get_limit(self):
return (self.upper, self.lower, self.nominal)
_limit = property(get_limit)
Is this what you were looking for?
Stephen Emslie
Well, I would have expected ResultProxy.rowcount to do just that
(return the number of rows in the last executed statement) but I just
get 0 from it. Perhaps someone could explain how to use it correctly.
Stephen Emslie
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:20 PM, jeff jeffre...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
It is always good to see some activity on this front.
sqlalchemy-migrate seems to be a good idea that needs more activity.
Perhaps try contributing to that project before branching.
Any comment from the sqlalchemy-migrate developers?
Stephen
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:13 PM, J. Cliff Dyer
Hi Bob
Looks like you're doing some fun thinking :)
Steve
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I spoke with zzzeek_ on IRC yesterday re: some code I'd written for an
introspective cascading delete function. We were previously using the ORM to
that might actually be the correct behaviour here.
Stephen Emslie
On Nov 18, 2007 4:20 PM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 12:29 PM, stephen emslie wrote:
I'm a bit confused now, so please tell me if I've got something
fundamentally wrong here, otherwise
Stephen Emslie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
contains_eager statement to be issued ends up
as the only 'children' relation in the result)
Any idea whether this is a bug or expected behavior? I could try to
rustle up a test script if it would help.
Stephen Emslie
On 9/11/07, stephen emslie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done some more playing
Thanks for the quick response.
Looking forward to the refactoring :)
Stephen Emslie
On 10/9/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 9, 2007, at 10:18 AM, stephen emslie wrote:
Hi. I've been quiet on this for a while. I'm getting by without this
behavior, though it would
.
Thanks for the help!
Stephen Emslie
On 9/4/07, stephen emslie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
im going to play with this a little bit, but my first instinct is
that you might want to use contains_eager('children.children', ...)
for your deeper aliases. but im not sure if something might prevent
(i.e. skipping the
first relation), but its nice to know I wasn't completely off that
mark :)
Stephen Emslie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email
from_statement() like we're doing
above.
This would certainly neaten things up :)
Stephen Emslie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy
here? MappedClass.c.age.between(1,2) behaves normally.
Stephen Emslie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Hi. I am using a self-referential mapper to represent a multi-level
tree of parent-child relationships. Typically I've been querying each
parent for children that I am interested in. Up till now I have made a
new query for each child that I am looking for, which is doesn't seem
like the most
16 matches
Mail list logo
