On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+1, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
> If I can just wrap this up, do i understand correctly that this would
> the functionality of "joined eager loading", except applied to something
> like an UPDATE..FROM ?
>
I think so although I can't say I'm 100% sure
On 02/27/2016 07:26 AM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 7:45:46 PM UTC+1, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I'm not either, and I'm scared of the SQL that would be generated
and the wire traffic/memory if there were. That would be subselects
within subqueryloads
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 7:45:46 PM UTC+1, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I'm not either, and I'm scared of the SQL that would be generated and the
> wire traffic/memory if there were. That would be subselects within
> subqueryloads within... this also seems a bit more about "updates to
>
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 4:54:01 AM UTC-5, Simon King wrote:
>
>
> I'm not aware of any way to do this.
>
>
I'm not either, and I'm scared of the SQL that would be generated and the
wire traffic/memory if there were. That would be subselects within
subqueryloads within... this also
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 2:33:13 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding your question properly. The return value from
> query.all() is a plain python list. You're asking for it to return a
> different kind of object, that wraps the underlying list and allows you to
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Piotr Dobrogost <
p...@2016.groups.google.dobrogost.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 11:10:36 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote
>>
>>
>> I can't think of a way you could do this with objects you've already
>> loaded into memory. Perhaps you could use
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 11:10:36 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote
>
>
> I can't think of a way you could do this with objects you've already
> loaded into memory. Perhaps you could use Query.update to issue the
> appropriate SQL directly to the database?
>
>
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Piotr Dobrogost <
p...@2016.groups.google.dobrogost.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 2:41:43 PM UTC+1, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Let's say I have a model Text with attribute "values" which is
>> association proxy.
>> I can update
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 2:41:43 PM UTC+1, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Let's say I have a model Text with attribute "values" which is association
> proxy.
> I can update single object like this:
> text = session.query(Text).one()
> text.values.update(...)
>
> How can I update
