Is there an easy way to drop all tables an recreate them at once?
At this moment I do a tableobject.create() for each table. I
searched the engine object for a list with registered table objects,
but I could not find one.
Also tableobject.drop() does not seem to drop my table sequences?
Hey All, and Mike in particular -
I occasionally find things that I'd like to change in the documentation, such
as adding Example N: Short Description Of Code Snippet to all the code
blocks for easy both easy referencing and direct linking. I'm happy enough to
do this, if someone cares to lay
well here is the funny thing, is that I was sure back in November
that someone would soon mention this, and I'd have to look into some
more elaborate way to call __new__ instead of __init__ etc., then
some people might want it configurable, but here we are 6 months
later and you are the
you need the secondary table explicit in a many-to-many join:
Information.mapper.add_property('datas', relation(Data.mapper,
rel_table,
primaryjoin=info_table.c.pk==rel_table.c.info_pk,
secondaryjoin=rel_table.c.data_pk==data_table.c.pk))
On Apr 23, 2006, at 8:39 AM, Gambit
I have tables with compound primary keys, like this:
# table task
# Individual task for a service
task = Table('task',
Column('system_id',
Integer,
primary_key=True,
nullable=False,
),
Column('id',
Integer,
Hey Michael,
So the docs will be updated with this, then?
-G
On Sunday, April 23, 2006, 5:54:33 PM, you wrote:
you need the secondary table explicit in a many-to-many join:
Information.mapper.add_property('datas', relation(Data.mapper,
rel_table,
gambit -
this doc ?
# define a mapper that does many-to-many on the 'itemkeywords'
association
# table
Article.mapper = mapper(Article, articles, properties = dict(
keywords = relation(mapper(Keyword, keywords), itemkeywords,
lazy=False)
)
)
itemkeywords is the
a syncrule is an object generated internally when you associate one
Mapper with another Mapper via a relation(), which is actually an
object called a PropertyLoader.
so lets use the Users/Address example. say we have classes User and
Address. the join condition is
Hey Mike,
I was thinking more of this one:
class User(object):
pass
class Keyword(object):
pass
Keyword.mapper = mapper(Keyword, keywords)
User.mapper = mapper(User, users, properties={
'keywords':relation(Keyword.mapper,
primaryjoin=users.c.user_id==userkeywords.c.user_id,
Hey Mike,
Speaking from a debugging point of view, it might be useful if error messages
get more text then just it failed, and died. Even if you just attached your
paragraph at the bottom starting So when the... either to the error itself
(always useful!) or somewhere in the docs (which,
I am using svn update from today..
I am testing with Firebird engine, which I realize may be busted.
However I just took a look at the MS-SQL engine and it does the same thing.
I have a table with a compound key, like this:
Tcontact = Table('contact',
Column('system_id',
On 4/20/06, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Vasily Sulatskov wrote: - may I suggest, that since this issue is decided completely within the source code for types.String, that various implementations of
String, corresponding to different user preferences with
Hey Mike,
Yeah, I see the problem -- didn't mean it to come across as criticism of how
things are! :)
Personally, I'm a big fan of extreemly verbose error messages, with
suggestions, sample code, or even usage cases when possible -- either in the
error message itself or referenced by an error
On Apr 23, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Gambit wrote:
Maybe just having it note back to a specific place in the
documentation for
future suggestions, steps to repro and solve?
yah thats great stuff.but im not in a hurry for things like that
as its a huge amount of effort that can suddenly be
your last stack trace there is still using the firebird module.
On Apr 23, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Brad Clements wrote:
I am using svn update from today..
I am testing with Firebird engine, which I realize may be busted.
However I just took a look at the MS-SQL engine and it does the
same
Michael Bayer wrote:
your last stack trace there is still using the firebird module.
yes it is. Sorry my phrasing was poor.
I should have said, gee, now I get this error in Firebird, so I will
now switch to ms-sql.
---
Using Tomcat but
16 matches
Mail list logo
