Nice checkin comments !
Thanks for all the work.
Huy
one word : BUGS ! which are fixed. I think everyone that is using
0.2.3 is going to want this one, as there was a lot broken with the
new mapper compilation feature (as promised !) thats now fixed, and
some pretty important
Michael Bayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
heres a diff. the test framework has the threadlocal thing turned
off by default and also plays some games with it.
you should be able to remove all the save() statements from the
tests and everything should keep working; with threadlocal
heres how im running it:
z-eeks-Computer:~/dev/sqlalchemy classic$ export PYTHONPATH=./lib/:./
test/
z-eeks-Computer:~/dev/sqlalchemy classic$ python threadlocal-
association.py
testdelete (__main__.AssociationTest) ... ok
testinsert (__main__.AssociationTest) ... ok
testmodify
On 6/28/06, Dennis Muhlestein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've set up a simple many-to-many relation almost exactly as the 0.2.4 docs specify for using a secondary table:drawing=Table( Column('id', SNIP all the columns / )tags=Table ( 'tags', engine,
Column ( 'id', Integer,
Charles Duffy wrote:
So -- that quick first cut is seeming to be good enough for my
immediate needs, such that not too much more is likely to happen to it
unless someone looks at it and provides a poke in the form of well,
we'll think about merging this *if* you do something.
Jonathan,
On 6/28/06, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dennis -im not getting these results. can you attach a more complete test program ?Sure enough, I deleted everything from my model except those few tables and I got the correct result to. It must be something that I'm adding later. I suspect it is
I see my last Firebird patch still hasn't been applied. It's the one that adds
support
for type_conv
I submitted it 2 or 3 times already.
I've attached it again.
--
Brad Clements,[EMAIL PROTECTED](315)268-1000
http://www.murkworks.com
AOL-IM or
On 6/28/06, Dennis Muhlestein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/06, Michael Bayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dennis -im not getting these results. can you attach a more complete test program ?Sure enough, I deleted everything from my model except those few tables and I got the correct result to. It
How do I build a ClauseElement using a mapped object.
Say I have a mapped object I got like so:
county = session.query(Counties).get(1)
I want to use this to construct a query. How do I build a ClauseElement
with it?
# This does not work, but it expresses what I'm trying to do.
expr =
Is SQLAlchemy is compatible with Python v2.2.1 and MySQLdb 0.9.2 ???
I have found nothing on the SQLAlchemy webpages.
I consider to use SQLAlchemy in PyLucid. But my web provider has only
these old versions available.
--
Mfg.
Jens Diemer
CMS in pure Python CGI: http://www.pylucid.org
OK, I was right, cascade_mappers is the culprit. I have a few other tables that also have relations to the drawings table. Before upgrading to
2.x, I'd set those relations up with cascade mappers. Adding any one of those relations back causes the recursion error. I can add the properties manually
first im seeing it for wahtever reason committed in 1672.
(hm thought you were in the users file...i can set you up with that)
On Jun 28, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Brad Clements wrote:
I see my last Firebird patch still hasn't been applied. It's the
one that adds support
for type_conv
I
Jens Diemer schrieb:
Is SQLAlchemy is compatible with Python v2.2.1 and MySQLdb 0.9.2 ???
I have patched the source and insert from __future__ import
generators, so yield is available.
I take sets.py from Python 2.4
But i have at least two problems:
File sqlalchemy\types.py, line 202, in
On 28 Jun 2006 at 15:04, Michael Bayer wrote:
first im seeing it for wahtever reason committed in 1672.
Thanks.
I think I first sent it to the list when it got jammed up 2 or 3 weeks ago,
then I sent
you a direct copy along with some other problem reports, so maybe it got lost
there. No
On 6/28/06, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh boy cascade_mapper is just evil.Did you see the test case I sent? It isn't working when I manually define it either. (for just one table)
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
I've set up a simple many-to-many relation almost exactly as the 0.2.4 docs specify for using a secondary table:drawing=Table( Column('id', SNIP all the columns / )tags=Table ( 'tags', engine,Column ( 'id', Integer, primary_key=True,nullable=False ),
Column ( 'name', VARCHAR(20),
Hello,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:40, Jens Diemer wrote:
Jens Diemer schrieb:
Is SQLAlchemy is compatible with Python v2.2.1 and MySQLdb 0.9.2 ???
I have patched the source and insert from __future__ import
generators, so yield is available.
I take sets.py from Python 2.4
But i have at
or you could get your ISP to install python 2.4. 2.2 has some
stability issues with weakrefs (which SA uses).
On Jun 28, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Jens Diemer wrote:
Jens Diemer schrieb:
Is SQLAlchemy is compatible with Python v2.2.1 and MySQLdb 0.9.2 ???
I have patched the source and insert from
On 6/28/06, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so much for 0.2.4.this was a pretty small endless-loop check fix,which is repaired in 1673.the amazing thing is that nobody has comeacross this one for many versions, its been in there for awhile.
I wonder if this fixes another small issue I'm
what breaks going from 2.3 to 2.4 ? just curious.
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:10 PM, William K. Volkman wrote:
Just FYI,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 16:41, Michael Bayer wrote:
or you could get your ISP to install python 2.4. 2.2 has some
stability issues with weakrefs (which SA uses).
Moving our
20 matches
Mail list logo
