Re: [sqlalchemy] mapper.order_by deprecated?

2017-05-09 Thread mike bayer
well, a "default", I disagree the problem is that simple. Because we have a "default", Mapper.order_by, but all those cases I mentioned, no idea. If we wanted to say that hey, "default" only means, "I'm querying for a single entity in full, alone, otherwise no order_by", I guess that's

Re: [sqlalchemy] mapper.order_by deprecated?

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Withers
Gotcha. Is there any way to specify a default ordering for queries against a model? (similar to that offered by the Django ORM?) cheers, Chris On 08/05/2017 23:51, mike bayer wrote: because, it only works for a really simplistic case, and for all the other cases, I have no idea what it

Re: [sqlalchemy] mapper.order_by deprecated?

2017-05-08 Thread mike bayer
because, it only works for a really simplistic case, and for all the other cases, I have no idea what it currently does, nor what it should do. Assume A and B have order_by.I have no idea what the output is, or should be, for: s.query(A, B) s.query(B, A) s.query(A).join(B)

[sqlalchemy] mapper.order_by deprecated?

2017-05-08 Thread Chris Withers
Hi All, I see mapper.order_by is deprecated in the latest release. Why is that? cheers, Chris -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See