Ah right OK that make sense. I was going to say that using undefer felt
kind of odd given that there's no existing property so this makes much more
sense.
Unfortunately I need to find a solution that works in the mean time until
your patch is merged so whilst i have you maybe you can explain
On 06/15/2017 11:09 AM, 'mike waites' via sqlalchemy wrote:
Thanks Mike.
I will definitely give this patch a try. I think this is exactly what
we need. Simon, thanks so much for sharing that post as well, bindparam
had completely escaped my attention and that will actually solve my
Thanks Mike.
I will definitely give this patch a try. I think this is exactly what we
need. Simon, thanks so much for sharing that post as well, bindparam had
completely escaped my attention and that will actually solve my immediate
use case.
@mike was just wondering if you could clarify
On 06/15/2017 08:25 AM, 'mike waites' via sqlalchemy wrote:
Hi
This is something i've been wrestling in different ways for some time so
i thought it was time that i sought a definitive answer on what the
"proper" way to do this is with the ORM.
Often you'll want to have some kind of
