Found the bottleneck! First, the results with the "correction" --
Db remains on disk:
-
[06:01 PM] ~/Data/carbonmodel$perl carbonmodel.pl
Prepare load testing
timethis 1000: 3 wallclock secs ( 0.23 usr + 0.41 sys = 0.64 CPU) @
1562.50/s (n=1000)
or 0.63 ms per
On 21 Mar 2009, at 15:31, P Kishor wrote:
> I did some benchmarking with the above schema using Perl DBI, and I
> get about 30 transactions per second as long as I returning the data
> to memory.
Even for Perl/DBI, that seems pretty slow. Depends on how much data
each of these transactions
The reason you're getting the same results is because you are
CPU-bound. I/O has nothing to do with this problem. From your
timings of your app, 31.76/33 = 96% CPU. If you were I/O bound, your
real time would be 33 seconds and your sys+user time would be 3
seconds, or something low.
My guess
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:37:15 -0500, P Kishor
wrote:
> [04:24 PM] ~/Data/carbonmodel$perl carbonmodel.pl
> Creating in memory tables... done.
> Transferring data to memory... done. Took: 90 wallclock secs (75.88
> usr + 8.44 sys = 84.32 CPU)
> Creating indexes... done. Took:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Nicolas Williams
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:55:32PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Nicolas Williams
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:43PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:07:17 -0500, Nicolas Williams
wrote:
>But the thing is, you might just set the cache size large enough and let
>it warm up as you go -- the effect should be the same if your DB doesn't
>grow very fast.
>
>> [Puneet:] Also, isn't there a 2 GB
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:55:32PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Nicolas Williams
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:43PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> >> If I can't improve 33 ms per query, then I can experiment with
> >
> > 33ms per-query
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Nicolas Williams
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:43PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
>> If I can't improve 33 ms per query, then I can experiment with
>
> 33ms per-query sounds like you're not caching enough of the database in
> memory.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:43PM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> If I can't improve 33 ms per query, then I can experiment with
33ms per-query sounds like you're not caching enough of the database in
memory. What's the cache size? Can you jack it up? Does the entire
dataset fit in memory? If so,
I'm not sure I completely understand your data structure, but here are
some ideas:
First, conduct experiments with different page and cache sizes. I
don't know if you jumped to a 32K page size or experimented with each
size, but experimentation is the way to go.
I'm guessing that in your
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
>
> Hi Puneet,
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:47:44 -0500, P Kishor
> wrote:
>
>>I should have mentioned the page_size in my OP. It is 32768 set by me
>>at the start of db creation.
>>
>>Yes, the db connection
Hi Puneet,
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:47:44 -0500, P Kishor
wrote:
>I should have mentioned the page_size in my OP. It is 32768 set by me
>at the start of db creation.
>
>Yes, the db connection is kept open.
Hm, apart from faster disks (15k RPM or high end SSD) I have
no idea
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
>
> Hi Puneet,
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:31:45 -0500, P Kishor
> wrote:
>
>>Part 1.
>>---
>>
>>I have the following schema in a SQLite db that is 430 MB on my
>>Macbook laptop's 320 GB HFS+ formatted
Hi Puneet,
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:31:45 -0500, P Kishor
wrote:
>Part 1.
>---
>
>I have the following schema in a SQLite db that is 430 MB on my
>Macbook laptop's 320 GB HFS+ formatted 7200 RPM disk with an 8 MB
>cache.
[...]
>How can I, if at all, speed this up?
Part 1.
---
I have the following schema in a SQLite db that is 430 MB on my
Macbook laptop's 320 GB HFS+ formatted 7200 RPM disk with an 8 MB
cache.
-- 1000,000 rows
CREATE TABLE cell (
cell_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
met_cell_id INTEGER,
8 other INTEGER or REAL columns
)
-- 38 rows
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:12:28 -0400 (EDT),
mrobi...@cs.fiu.edu wrote:
>Thanks for your help.
>
>I checked those sites, and I worked with sqlite3.exe using the command
>line tool, no problems, however I can not find anywhere samples of how to
>applied these commands in C.
>
>Thru trial and error, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> The OS can't know when a SQLite3 transaction has finished,
It doesn't need to. A second connection will enter its busy handler
until the transaction in the first connection has completed.
Roger
-BEGIN PGP
17 matches
Mail list logo