On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
> On 08/06/2016 03:28 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:08 PM, David Raymond
>> wrote:
>>
>> ..
>>
>> Apart from the default location of the files, it reads like your
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Darren Duncan
wrote:
> On 2016-08-04 7:27 AM, Jim Callahan wrote:
>
>> Steps
>> Agree with Darren Duncan and Dr. Hipp you may want to have at least 3
>> separate steps
>> (each step should be a separate transaction):
>>
>> 1. Simple load
On 2016-08-04 7:27 AM, Jim Callahan wrote:
Steps
Agree with Darren Duncan and Dr. Hipp you may want to have at least 3
separate steps
(each step should be a separate transaction):
1. Simple load
2. Create additional column
3. Create index
Have you pre-defined the table you are loading data
On 08/06/2016 03:28 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:08 PM, David Raymond
wrote:
There's a depreciated pragma, PRAGMA temp_store_directory =
'directory-name'; that apears to still work ok for now at least.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:08 PM, David Raymond
wrote:
> There's a depreciated pragma, PRAGMA temp_store_directory =
> 'directory-name'; that apears to still work ok for now at least.
> http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_temp_store_directory
>
> I've used it for the
There's a depreciated pragma, PRAGMA temp_store_directory = 'directory-name';
that apears to still work ok for now at least.
http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_temp_store_directory
I've used it for the same reasons you've both mentioned about space, though for
me it vacuuming a huge db,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
> wrote:
> > Okay, I followed some of the advice y'all gave and got some results.
> >
> > 1. The original problem was compromised by
CREATE INDEX has two problems:
1) poor default location of temporary storage.
2) gets wedged on very large indexes.
I'm using the sqlite that came with Xubuntu 14.04, I think it's version
3.8.2.
I created a table, and used .import to populate it with records, about 1.4
billion of them. The
Hi, Kevin,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Okay, I followed some of the advice y'all gave and got some results.
>
> 1. The original problem was compromised by malformed input. However, it
> appears that did not cause the wedging of the process.
Okay, I followed some of the advice y'all gave and got some results.
1. The original problem was compromised by malformed input. However, it
appears that did not cause the wedging of the process. See (3) below.
2. I separated the steps, and started small. Time increased slightly
sub-linearly
On 8/5/16, Detlef Golze wrote:
> As documented, the query planner only uses the index if the SELECT contains
> that exact same condition.
>
> According to .eqp with 3.12.1 the following statement indeed uses the index:
>
> SELECT Value1 FROM MyTable WHERE Value1<>0 AND
Hi,
suppose I have a partial index like that:
CREATE INDEX MyIndex1 ON MyTable ( Value1 ) WHERE Value1<>0;
As documented, the query planner only uses the index if the SELECT contains
that exact same condition.
According to .eqp with 3.12.1 the following statement indeed uses the index:
iSCSI is not shared network filesystem file system.
iSCSI is a used to mount a local block file system using "SCSI over an IP
Network Cable". Without the i the iSCSI protocol is plain SCSI over a SCSI
Parallel Cable or sometimes (if you call it SAS) SCSI over a Serial Cable. You
can also
Il 05/08/2016 09.47, Simon Slavin ha scritto:
On 5 Aug 2016, at 7:30am, Michele Pradella wrote:
Hi all, I read documentation about using sqlite on a Network file system, so I
know is not a good environment because file lock problem. Anyway do you think I
can have
On 5 Aug 2016, at 7:30am, Michele Pradella wrote:
> Hi all, I read documentation about using sqlite on a Network file system, so
> I know is not a good environment because file lock problem. Anyway do you
> think I can have the same problem if I'm sure that only my
Hi all, I read documentation about using sqlite on a Network file
system, so I know is not a good environment because file lock problem.
Anyway do you think I can have the same problem if I'm sure that only my
precess try write or read database? So I have just one process using
network DB (for
Domonic Tom wrote:
> Would anyone know how to get the table names from a specific database in C++
> or just using the C API for sqlite?
You execute the query "SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='table';".
> I have tried the below but I get nothing.
>
> string exec_string = "SELECT name
Would anyone know how to get the table names from a specific database in C++ or
just using the C API for sqlite?
I have tried the below but I get nothing. Thought I might be able to move the
list of names into a table but it doesn't seem to want to work. Clearly I
can't do this using sql..
18 matches
Mail list logo